<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another VIA-based UMPC problem.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.umpcportal.com/2006/06/another-via-based-umpc-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2006/06/another-via-based-umpc-problem/</link>
	<description>portable pc, mobile computer, pocket pc and handheld computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:29:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2006/06/another-via-based-umpc-problem/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 03:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.umpcportal.com/?p=1532#comment-90</guid>
		<description>http://shop2.outpost.com/product/4714029?site=sr:SEARCH:MAIN_RSLT_PG&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You&#039;re right, it is the NX.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;-J</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color:#EEEEEE">
<p><a href="http://shop2.outpost.com/product/4714029?site=sr:SEARCH:MAIN_RSLT_PG" rel="nofollow">http://shop2.outpost.com/product/4714029?site=sr:SEARCH:MAIN_RSLT_PG</a></p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, it is the NX.</p>
<p>-J</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chippy</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2006/06/another-via-based-umpc-problem/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Chippy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 17:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.umpcportal.com/?p=1532#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Interesting. Its probably based on the geode NX (an athlon derivative) rather than the LX (based on National Semiconductor designs.) Can you post the link?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Regards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color:#EEEEEE">
<p>Interesting. Its probably based on the geode NX (an athlon derivative) rather than the LX (based on National Semiconductor designs.) Can you post the link?</p>
<p>Regards.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2006/06/another-via-based-umpc-problem/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 16:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.umpcportal.com/?p=1532#comment-88</guid>
		<description>They very well might be.  Fry&#039;s (geek heaven except for crummy customer service) sells a Geode based PC for $199.  Would be worth a try.&lt;br/&gt; -J</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color:#EEEEEE">
<p>They very well might be.  Fry&#8217;s (geek heaven except for crummy customer service) sells a Geode based PC for $199.  Would be worth a try.<br /> -J</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chippy</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2006/06/another-via-based-umpc-problem/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Chippy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.umpcportal.com/?p=1532#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Hey. Thats a damn good point. &lt;br/&gt;In theory, XP works on this processor although the integrated graphics/memory controller and soutbridge probably aren&#039;t supported.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Regards&lt;br/&gt;Steve / Chippy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color:#EEEEEE">
<p>Hey. Thats a damn good point. <br />In theory, XP works on this processor although the integrated graphics/memory controller and soutbridge probably aren&#8217;t supported.  </p>
<p>Regards<br />Steve / Chippy.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2006/06/another-via-based-umpc-problem/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 15:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.umpcportal.com/?p=1532#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Gee, that PepperPadPlus is sounding better each day.  I wonder if I could dual boot it with XP Tablet Edition...  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Or I&#039;ll wait a year for either the bugs to be squashed or the next handtop platform to be announced.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;-J</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color:#EEEEEE">
<p>Gee, that PepperPadPlus is sounding better each day.  I wonder if I could dual boot it with XP Tablet Edition&#8230;  </p>
<p>Or I&#8217;ll wait a year for either the bugs to be squashed or the next handtop platform to be announced.</p>
<p>-J</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTitanic</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2006/06/another-via-based-umpc-problem/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>CTitanic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 01:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.umpcportal.com/?p=1532#comment-85</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m using TrueCrypt a program that allows to mount an encrypted drive using part of any HDD and when I&#039;m using that encrypted drive, I do not notice any slowdown.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://www.tweaks2k2.com/images/encryption.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color:#EEEEEE">
<p>I&#8217;m using TrueCrypt a program that allows to mount an encrypted drive using part of any HDD and when I&#8217;m using that encrypted drive, I do not notice any slowdown.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tweaks2k2.com/images/encryption.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.tweaks2k2.com/images/encryption.jpg</a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTitanic</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2006/06/another-via-based-umpc-problem/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>CTitanic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 01:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.umpcportal.com/?p=1532#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Osmark has a series of tests for encryption and decryption and  the results are a lot higher than in the Q1  and in general than in Intel processors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color:#EEEEEE">
<p>Osmark has a series of tests for encryption and decryption and  the results are a lot higher than in the Q1  and in general than in Intel processors.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

