<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JKKMobile. video review of the ASUS Eee PC 900</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/04/jkkmobile-video-review-of-the-asus-eee-pc-900/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/04/jkkmobile-video-review-of-the-asus-eee-pc-900</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: JKKMobile. video review of the ASUS Eee PC 900 &#124; UMPCPortal Video</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/04/jkkmobile-video-review-of-the-asus-eee-pc-900#comment-1143</link>
		<dc:creator>JKKMobile. video review of the ASUS Eee PC 900 &#124; UMPCPortal Video</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 13:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/04/jkkmobile-video-review-of-the-asus-eee-pc-900/#comment-1143</guid>
		<description>[...]  Added 01 May 08 from www.umpcportal.com  Flag as inappropriate or broken   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Added 01 May 08 from <a href="http://www.umpcportal.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.umpcportal.com</a>  Flag as inappropriate or broken   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: specterss</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/04/jkkmobile-video-review-of-the-asus-eee-pc-900#comment-1134</link>
		<dc:creator>specterss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/04/jkkmobile-video-review-of-the-asus-eee-pc-900/#comment-1134</guid>
		<description>Win license cost something.
Anyway primary drive is 4GB in both case.
Actualy I don't see a good reason for puting windows on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Win license cost something.<br />
Anyway primary drive is 4GB in both case.<br />
Actualy I don&#8217;t see a good reason for puting windows on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/04/jkkmobile-video-review-of-the-asus-eee-pc-900#comment-1127</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/04/jkkmobile-video-review-of-the-asus-eee-pc-900/#comment-1127</guid>
		<description>Hello from England.

Thanks for the review - Very good.

A question from someone who is not very computer literate. If the Windows PC900 has 12Gb of Flash memory and the Linux version has 20Gb. Is there any reason why you could not buy the Linux version and then do a fresh load of Windows XP as the new OS. As a full load of Windows XP is just under 2Gb, would that not leave you with an XP version of the PC900 with aprox 18Gb of spare memory ?

Many thanks 

Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello from England.</p>
<p>Thanks for the review - Very good.</p>
<p>A question from someone who is not very computer literate. If the Windows PC900 has 12Gb of Flash memory and the Linux version has 20Gb. Is there any reason why you could not buy the Linux version and then do a fresh load of Windows XP as the new OS. As a full load of Windows XP is just under 2Gb, would that not leave you with an XP version of the PC900 with aprox 18Gb of spare memory ?</p>
<p>Many thanks </p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: specterss</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/04/jkkmobile-video-review-of-the-asus-eee-pc-900#comment-1123</link>
		<dc:creator>specterss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/04/jkkmobile-video-review-of-the-asus-eee-pc-900/#comment-1123</guid>
		<description>Can someone please take a meter and measure this thing once and for all. (dimension, weight).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone please take a meter and measure this thing once and for all. (dimension, weight).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: answerer</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/04/jkkmobile-video-review-of-the-asus-eee-pc-900#comment-1122</link>
		<dc:creator>answerer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 06:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/04/jkkmobile-video-review-of-the-asus-eee-pc-900/#comment-1122</guid>
		<description>not overclocked.
in the first edition the cpu clock rate was just reduced to 600Mhz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not overclocked.<br />
in the first edition the cpu clock rate was just reduced to 600Mhz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doubtful</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/04/jkkmobile-video-review-of-the-asus-eee-pc-900#comment-1120</link>
		<dc:creator>doubtful</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 03:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/04/jkkmobile-video-review-of-the-asus-eee-pc-900/#comment-1120</guid>
		<description>Is the eee G2 with the same processor than the eee first generation? cos if so, how come the different speed? is it just overclocked? 
And tks for the review</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the eee G2 with the same processor than the eee first generation? cos if so, how come the different speed? is it just overclocked?<br />
And tks for the review</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
