Comments on: Eee PC 900 battery life tests. Thoughts on Atom.

By: 南京网络营销

南京网络营销 — Sat, 26 Jun 2010 01:27:48 +0000

南京seo ,南京网络营销,南京网络推广。希望能和您做链接。网址http://www.seo7t.com QQ：8582572

By: brecklundin

brecklundin — Sat, 24 May 2008 02:57:23 +0000

This is the first I have hunted for battery life info on the new Eee’s. I have to say the reports make it a deal break of the first order. I have an HP NX9420 17″ laptop (T7400 C2D) CPU that gets a solid 3.5-4.5 hrs from it’s standard battery with wifi on and active use and about 75-80% brightness. I would have expected at least that sort of life from such a tiny device.

I guess I will pass on this new generation of UMPC type devices as they are not ready to actually be, well, mobile under real world use conditions.

Thanks for the info…

By: DavidC1

DavidC1 — Tue, 06 May 2008 23:03:53 +0000

Actually, the Celeron M used in the EEE PCs are 7W TDP variants. There’s inherent power savings features in all the Silverthorne-derived CPUs that isn’t turned off that’s not existant in the Celeron M.

I am sure that the differences will be bigger, but hmm, 1 hour for the EEE is pretty disappointing.

By: Eee PC 900 Battery Life and Intel Atom : Small Laptops and Notebooks

Eee PC 900 Battery Life and Intel Atom : Small Laptops and Notebooks — Tue, 06 May 2008 16:05:28 +0000

[...] – UMPC Portal – Liliputing – [...]

By: PJE

PJE — Tue, 06 May 2008 11:33:09 +0000

Those numbers are seem almost generated by a random number generator. There seems to be no rule (that I can see) for how bad the 900 is running compared to the 700.

The only thing I can think is causing the differences is the 900 is running at 900MHz while the 700 is running at 630… On applications when can use the CPU the battery will be drained quickly, but on applications which can use hardware video acceleration (XVID) the CPU is idling and therefore the times are closer.

Unless I can get 3+ Hours of use with WiFi on I’ll wait for the next iteration.