<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q1 Ultra needs to be under 600 Euros to compete with Eee. Would you buy it?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/05/q1-ultra-needs-to-be-under-600-euros-to-compete-with-eee-would-you-buy-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/05/q1-ultra-needs-to-be-under-600-euros-to-compete-with-eee-would-you-buy-it/</link>
	<description>portable pc, mobile computer, pocket pc and handheld computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:29:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/05/q1-ultra-needs-to-be-under-600-euros-to-compete-with-eee-would-you-buy-it/#comment-10100</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 21:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/05/q1-ultra-needs-to-be-under-600-euros-to-compete-with-eee-would-you-buy-it/#comment-10100</guid>
		<description>Just a warning for anyone looking to purchase a laptop from SAVEONSAMSUNG(JOKE OF A COMPANY AND PATHETIC CUSTOMER SERVICES)

A summary of this pathetic excuse for a company:-

They charge you to check the laptop is working before shipping!
I didnt take this service and received a dead one.
They refused to refund my Saturday delivery charge even as a gesture of goodwill.
They insisted I use the manufacturer warranty even though I received it dead from them.
Eventually after much arguing arranged for a refund. They collected the laptop(after trying to make me pay for the return), then they sent another one!
Still trying to get my money refunded over a month after they receivied the laptop back, excuses galore - cant see it in their stock etc (even though it is their delivery firm bringing it back to them).

This is the worst company I have ever dealt with on the net and almost makes me want to cease with Internet Shopping.

AVOID AT ALL COSTS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a warning for anyone looking to purchase a laptop from SAVEONSAMSUNG(JOKE OF A COMPANY AND PATHETIC CUSTOMER SERVICES)</p>
<p>A summary of this pathetic excuse for a company:-</p>
<p>They charge you to check the laptop is working before shipping!<br />
I didnt take this service and received a dead one.<br />
They refused to refund my Saturday delivery charge even as a gesture of goodwill.<br />
They insisted I use the manufacturer warranty even though I received it dead from them.<br />
Eventually after much arguing arranged for a refund. They collected the laptop(after trying to make me pay for the return), then they sent another one!<br />
Still trying to get my money refunded over a month after they receivied the laptop back, excuses galore &#8211; cant see it in their stock etc (even though it is their delivery firm bringing it back to them).</p>
<p>This is the worst company I have ever dealt with on the net and almost makes me want to cease with Internet Shopping.</p>
<p>AVOID AT ALL COSTS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicente</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/05/q1-ultra-needs-to-be-under-600-euros-to-compete-with-eee-would-you-buy-it/#comment-2456</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicente</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 16:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/05/q1-ultra-needs-to-be-under-600-euros-to-compete-with-eee-would-you-buy-it/#comment-2456</guid>
		<description>I am baffled by why XPTE is now priced at a PREMIUM over Vista.  For this platform why do they even bother with Vista?  I know MS is forcing it on all of us, but Samsung should really push back on this point.  A base unit with 12G or 16G SSD like with the Asus would be a better match against Asus than continuing to ship with the SLOW 1.8-inch hard drive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am baffled by why XPTE is now priced at a PREMIUM over Vista.  For this platform why do they even bother with Vista?  I know MS is forcing it on all of us, but Samsung should really push back on this point.  A base unit with 12G or 16G SSD like with the Asus would be a better match against Asus than continuing to ship with the SLOW 1.8-inch hard drive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chippy</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/05/q1-ultra-needs-to-be-under-600-euros-to-compete-with-eee-would-you-buy-it/#comment-2450</link>
		<dc:creator>chippy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/05/q1-ultra-needs-to-be-under-600-euros-to-compete-with-eee-would-you-buy-it/#comment-2450</guid>
		<description>Hi Tovarish.
Theres a big cost difference between XPTE and XPHome. I also think that people would pay 100 for XPPro/TE over linux in most cases. However, in some cases and in many cases at the low-cost end, XP is probably worth less than 100.  Point taken.

Steve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tovarish.<br />
Theres a big cost difference between XPTE and XPHome. I also think that people would pay 100 for XPPro/TE over linux in most cases. However, in some cases and in many cases at the low-cost end, XP is probably worth less than 100.  Point taken.</p>
<p>Steve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tovarish</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/05/q1-ultra-needs-to-be-under-600-euros-to-compete-with-eee-would-you-buy-it/#comment-2440</link>
		<dc:creator>tovarish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 10:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/05/q1-ultra-needs-to-be-under-600-euros-to-compete-with-eee-would-you-buy-it/#comment-2440</guid>
		<description>i dont think that XPTE deserves a 100 euro value since you have already discounted the lack of touchscreen. Furthermore ASUS adds xp for about 50 euros more on the EEE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont think that XPTE deserves a 100 euro value since you have already discounted the lack of touchscreen. Furthermore ASUS adds xp for about 50 euros more on the EEE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chippy</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/05/q1-ultra-needs-to-be-under-600-euros-to-compete-with-eee-would-you-buy-it/#comment-2436</link>
		<dc:creator>chippy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 07:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/05/q1-ultra-needs-to-be-under-600-euros-to-compete-with-eee-would-you-buy-it/#comment-2436</guid>
		<description>But its the 600Mhz, no BT version right?
449 is 565 Euro BTW.

Maybe it&#039;s better to compare the A100 600Mhz version as the 701 is a 633Mhz Celeron and also has no BT.

In that case you get 40Gb, 1GB, HDD, Touchscreen, Higher res, XPTE, lighter, smaller. Near full size keyboard included. Is that 265 Euro better than a 701? 165 Euro Better than a 900? I think so.

Steve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But its the 600Mhz, no BT version right?<br />
449 is 565 Euro BTW.</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s better to compare the A100 600Mhz version as the 701 is a 633Mhz Celeron and also has no BT.</p>
<p>In that case you get 40Gb, 1GB, HDD, Touchscreen, Higher res, XPTE, lighter, smaller. Near full size keyboard included. Is that 265 Euro better than a 701? 165 Euro Better than a 900? I think so.</p>
<p>Steve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/05/q1-ultra-needs-to-be-under-600-euros-to-compete-with-eee-would-you-buy-it/#comment-2435</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 07:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/05/q1-ultra-needs-to-be-under-600-euros-to-compete-with-eee-would-you-buy-it/#comment-2435</guid>
		<description>I think a better comparison would be with the eee900 due to the screen resolution.

Also try Saveonsamsung (where your Q1U came from), the pack described above is £449:

http://saveonsamsung.com/Product/id/410507</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a better comparison would be with the eee900 due to the screen resolution.</p>
<p>Also try Saveonsamsung (where your Q1U came from), the pack described above is £449:</p>
<p><a href="http://saveonsamsung.com/Product/id/410507" rel="nofollow">http://saveonsamsung.com/Product/id/410507</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

