<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AMD Launches Puma. No Netbook, UMPC focus until 2010.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/06/amd-launches-puma-no-netbook-umpc-focus-until-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/06/amd-launches-puma-no-netbook-umpc-focus-until-2010/</link>
	<description>portable pc, mobile computer, pocket pc and handheld computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:29:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidC1</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/06/amd-launches-puma-no-netbook-umpc-focus-until-2010/#comment-3034</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidC1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 07:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/06/amd-launches-puma-no-netbook-umpc-focus-until-2010/#comment-3034</guid>
		<description>No way it does, its a regular A64 X2 with some power enhancements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way it does, its a regular A64 X2 with some power enhancements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charbax</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/06/amd-launches-puma-no-netbook-umpc-focus-until-2010/#comment-3033</link>
		<dc:creator>Charbax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 07:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/06/amd-launches-puma-no-netbook-umpc-focus-until-2010/#comment-3033</guid>
		<description>Yup, even though AMD says they aren&#039;t doing UMPC or MID, they are saying that the low power and low cost Turion Ultra has 50% more performance then the Intel Atom and still lower power consumption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, even though AMD says they aren&#8217;t doing UMPC or MID, they are saying that the low power and low cost Turion Ultra has 50% more performance then the Intel Atom and still lower power consumption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidC1</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/06/amd-launches-puma-no-netbook-umpc-focus-until-2010/#comment-3031</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidC1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 07:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/06/amd-launches-puma-no-netbook-umpc-focus-until-2010/#comment-3031</guid>
		<description>The AMD-based UMPC is a Turion TL-56 with clock speed of 900MHz. I saw it on another article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The AMD-based UMPC is a Turion TL-56 with clock speed of 900MHz. I saw it on another article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

