<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: M704 and Q1Ultra compared on video.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/07/m704-and-q1ultra-compared-on-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/07/m704-and-q1ultra-compared-on-video/</link>
	<description>portable pc, mobile computer, pocket pc and handheld computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:29:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmad Jarrad</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/07/m704-and-q1ultra-compared-on-video/#comment-10902</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmad Jarrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 14:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/?p=2754#comment-10902</guid>
		<description>I am having a hard time being able to compare te M704 to the Q Ultra. I travel alot for work and have the ability to purchase my next traveller&#039;s laptop from the U.S., U.K., Dubai, or Saudi Arabia. Between the Middle East - the States - UK I am finding vast differences in prices for the M704, while the Samsung is pretty much the same. The only spec differences in the M704 are the size of the L2 Cache which ranges from 64kB to 1MB, but price from $500 to almost $1000, and some place the docking station is included, while others its a seperate accesory to be purchased.

When testing the two devices side by side, did you notice the M704 being much slower then the Q1U, due to a Cache deficiency, or only in video playback as noted?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am having a hard time being able to compare te M704 to the Q Ultra. I travel alot for work and have the ability to purchase my next traveller&#8217;s laptop from the U.S., U.K., Dubai, or Saudi Arabia. Between the Middle East &#8211; the States &#8211; UK I am finding vast differences in prices for the M704, while the Samsung is pretty much the same. The only spec differences in the M704 are the size of the L2 Cache which ranges from 64kB to 1MB, but price from $500 to almost $1000, and some place the docking station is included, while others its a seperate accesory to be purchased.</p>
<p>When testing the two devices side by side, did you notice the M704 being much slower then the Q1U, due to a Cache deficiency, or only in video playback as noted?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chippy</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/07/m704-and-q1ultra-compared-on-video/#comment-5567</link>
		<dc:creator>chippy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/?p=2754#comment-5567</guid>
		<description>Try the Nero media solution. 
It seems that that might have been the reason. Perhaps it has the drivers for the VIA acceleration in it?

Steve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try the Nero media solution.<br />
It seems that that might have been the reason. Perhaps it has the drivers for the VIA acceleration in it?</p>
<p>Steve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chippy</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/07/m704-and-q1ultra-compared-on-video/#comment-5566</link>
		<dc:creator>chippy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/?p=2754#comment-5566</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t recommend either for gaming but in theory, the Q1 Ultra has a much better 3D capability. 
Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t recommend either for gaming but in theory, the Q1 Ultra has a much better 3D capability.<br />
Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chippy</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/07/m704-and-q1ultra-compared-on-video/#comment-5565</link>
		<dc:creator>chippy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/?p=2754#comment-5565</guid>
		<description>M704 is as quiet, yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M704 is as quiet, yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chippy</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/07/m704-and-q1ultra-compared-on-video/#comment-5564</link>
		<dc:creator>chippy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/?p=2754#comment-5564</guid>
		<description>Sorry Mike. No! (And sorry for the late response)
Steve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Mike. No! (And sorry for the late response)<br />
Steve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cane</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/07/m704-and-q1ultra-compared-on-video/#comment-4326</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/?p=2754#comment-4326</guid>
		<description>You didn&#039;t happen to take any photos of this next to an EeePC for size comparison, did you?

I doubt this will ever get to the U.S. except via importers for a high price.  Shame.  I&#039;d like to have fondled it a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You didn&#8217;t happen to take any photos of this next to an EeePC for size comparison, did you?</p>
<p>I doubt this will ever get to the U.S. except via importers for a high price.  Shame.  I&#8217;d like to have fondled it a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zorg</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/07/m704-and-q1ultra-compared-on-video/#comment-4325</link>
		<dc:creator>zorg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 19:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/?p=2754#comment-4325</guid>
		<description>How about noise?  I had a loaner OQO 02 for a while, but the fan sounded like an angry beehive, a deal-breaker in meetings or anywhere I wanted to have a low-profile experience.  The Q1UP is supposedly a noise-free experience under &quot;typical&quot; usage.  Is the M704 similarly quiet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about noise?  I had a loaner OQO 02 for a while, but the fan sounded like an angry beehive, a deal-breaker in meetings or anywhere I wanted to have a low-profile experience.  The Q1UP is supposedly a noise-free experience under &#8220;typical&#8221; usage.  Is the M704 similarly quiet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/07/m704-and-q1ultra-compared-on-video/#comment-4323</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 19:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/?p=2754#comment-4323</guid>
		<description>I wish this had the Via-Nano the purchase would be a no brainer but since it&#039;s sporting a clearly out dated chipset it&#039;s very hard to take the plunge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish this had the Via-Nano the purchase would be a no brainer but since it&#8217;s sporting a clearly out dated chipset it&#8217;s very hard to take the plunge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous Reader</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/07/m704-and-q1ultra-compared-on-video/#comment-4320</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/?p=2754#comment-4320</guid>
		<description>Off-topic!
Interesting scientific comparison of battery life of devices using SSD flash vs Hard Drives (the hard drives win).  See:

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ssd-hdd-battery,1955.html

&quot;Conclusion  - The results of our testing are a shock for anyone who cares about battery runtime, as our results prove unmistakably that battery runtimes do not increase when using flash based SSDs. As a matter of fact, most flash SSD products actually contribute to emptying your battery even faster&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Off-topic!<br />
Interesting scientific comparison of battery life of devices using SSD flash vs Hard Drives (the hard drives win).  See:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ssd-hdd-battery,1955.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ssd-hdd-battery,1955.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Conclusion  &#8211; The results of our testing are a shock for anyone who cares about battery runtime, as our results prove unmistakably that battery runtimes do not increase when using flash based SSDs. As a matter of fact, most flash SSD products actually contribute to emptying your battery even faster&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TareX</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/07/m704-and-q1ultra-compared-on-video/#comment-4313</link>
		<dc:creator>TareX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 13:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/?p=2754#comment-4313</guid>
		<description>I was waiting for that video. Thanks.

Questions:
1) You forgot to compare the Displays. Resolution? Touchscreen? Which is better for handwriting recognition...etc
2) Gaming: How better is the graphics card on the Q1? The form factor is very psp-like so I&#039;d like to knowhow it good it plays games, and how fast that card is.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was waiting for that video. Thanks.</p>
<p>Questions:<br />
1) You forgot to compare the Displays. Resolution? Touchscreen? Which is better for handwriting recognition&#8230;etc<br />
2) Gaming: How better is the graphics card on the Q1? The form factor is very psp-like so I&#8217;d like to knowhow it good it plays games, and how fast that card is.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hanzo</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/07/m704-and-q1ultra-compared-on-video/#comment-4309</link>
		<dc:creator>Hanzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 10:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/?p=2754#comment-4309</guid>
		<description>Hi Chippy

   Have you found out why M704 could handle 6Mbps WMVHD video? That&#039;s the most surprising thing and I want to improve my 2133 as the M704 did.

Thanks a lot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chippy</p>
<p>   Have you found out why M704 could handle 6Mbps WMVHD video? That&#8217;s the most surprising thing and I want to improve my 2133 as the M704 did.</p>
<p>Thanks a lot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

