<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CCC Week. Challenges 7-9</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kes</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9#comment-11283</link>
		<dc:creator>Kes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9/#comment-11283</guid>
		<description>The more I look at the Q1 Ultra, the more I like it. It seems like a versatile device especially with the organiser and keyboard. They seem to be coming onto eBay with reasonable frequency too. I probably wouldn't have considered it without the Chippy seal-of-approval!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more I look at the Q1 Ultra, the more I like it. It seems like a versatile device especially with the organiser and keyboard. They seem to be coming onto eBay with reasonable frequency too. I probably wouldn&#8217;t have considered it without the Chippy seal-of-approval!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chippy</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9#comment-11145</link>
		<dc:creator>Chippy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9/#comment-11145</guid>
		<description>All previous challenges here:
http://www.umpcportal.com/tag/customer-challenge</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All previous challenges here:<br />
<a href="http://www.umpcportal.com/tag/customer-challenge" rel="nofollow">http://www.umpcportal.com/tag/customer-challenge</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9#comment-11033</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9/#comment-11033</guid>
		<description>Did I miss challenges 1-6?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did I miss challenges 1-6?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave P</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9#comment-11029</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9/#comment-11029</guid>
		<description>For Europeans looking for a pocketable computer, don't rule out the OQO e2. While the stateside prices remain high, Expansys has a 1.5 GHz e2 for about 700 pounds and a similar model with T-Mobile 3g for 840.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For Europeans looking for a pocketable computer, don&#8217;t rule out the OQO e2. While the stateside prices remain high, Expansys has a 1.5 GHz e2 for about 700 pounds and a similar model with T-Mobile 3g for 840.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kes</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9#comment-11028</link>
		<dc:creator>Kes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9/#comment-11028</guid>
		<description>Thanks Chippy. 
Interesting... I had looked at the Q1 Ultra but not really given it serious consideration. I thought it was starting to look a little dated and not great value. For £500 I could just about get the 600 MHz version. 
I was veering towards the M912 or even the Everun Note given your glowing praise of it. The M912 seems like a better value product (albeit a tad heavy) but you're the expert.
I'm a bit confused as to how a 600MHz Intel A110 compares to a 1.6GHz Atom power-wise.
I may have to look out for Q1 Ultra bargains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Chippy.<br />
Interesting&#8230; I had looked at the Q1 Ultra but not really given it serious consideration. I thought it was starting to look a little dated and not great value. For £500 I could just about get the 600 MHz version.<br />
I was veering towards the M912 or even the Everun Note given your glowing praise of it. The M912 seems like a better value product (albeit a tad heavy) but you&#8217;re the expert.<br />
I&#8217;m a bit confused as to how a 600MHz Intel A110 compares to a 1.6GHz Atom power-wise.<br />
I may have to look out for Q1 Ultra bargains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9#comment-10990</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9/#comment-10990</guid>
		<description>Well the OpenBook design from VIA should be a 1kg/9inches device with a 2.5in HDD.

However we are still waiting for any OpenBook-based device to be actually released and publicly available... And weight could be finally higher, or maybe it will be 1kg with a damn small battery that won't last for long. :-/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the OpenBook design from VIA should be a 1kg/9inches device with a 2.5in HDD.</p>
<p>However we are still waiting for any OpenBook-based device to be actually released and publicly available&#8230; And weight could be finally higher, or maybe it will be 1kg with a damn small battery that won&#8217;t last for long. :-/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9#comment-10989</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9/#comment-10989</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your response!  I've looked at the SH6 and SH8, but comparing the prices to the M912, it just didn't seem worth the price.  As for the 1.8 inch drives - while they are getting larger, the 2.5 are getting larger faster, and with the data set that I have, (and it is growing all the time), I'm afraid that the 1.8 will always be below the curve for me.

But it is also nice to know that it seems like I picked the right machine!

Thanks again!

bj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your response!  I&#8217;ve looked at the SH6 and SH8, but comparing the prices to the M912, it just didn&#8217;t seem worth the price.  As for the 1.8 inch drives - while they are getting larger, the 2.5 are getting larger faster, and with the data set that I have, (and it is growing all the time), I&#8217;m afraid that the 1.8 will always be below the curve for me.</p>
<p>But it is also nice to know that it seems like I picked the right machine!</p>
<p>Thanks again!</p>
<p>bj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
