<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CCC Week. Challenges 7-9</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9/</link>
	<description>portable pc, mobile computer, pocket pc and handheld computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:17:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kes</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9/#comment-11283</link>
		<dc:creator>Kes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9/#comment-11283</guid>
		<description>The more I look at the Q1 Ultra, the more I like it. It seems like a versatile device especially with the organiser and keyboard. They seem to be coming onto eBay with reasonable frequency too. I probably wouldn&#039;t have considered it without the Chippy seal-of-approval!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more I look at the Q1 Ultra, the more I like it. It seems like a versatile device especially with the organiser and keyboard. They seem to be coming onto eBay with reasonable frequency too. I probably wouldn&#8217;t have considered it without the Chippy seal-of-approval!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chippy</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9/#comment-11145</link>
		<dc:creator>Chippy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9/#comment-11145</guid>
		<description>All previous challenges here:
http://www.umpcportal.com/tag/customer-challenge</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All previous challenges here:<br />
<a href="http://www.umpcportal.com/tag/customer-challenge" rel="nofollow">http://www.umpcportal.com/tag/customer-challenge</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9/#comment-11033</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9/#comment-11033</guid>
		<description>Did I miss challenges 1-6?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did I miss challenges 1-6?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave P</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9/#comment-11029</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9/#comment-11029</guid>
		<description>For Europeans looking for a pocketable computer, don&#039;t rule out the OQO e2. While the stateside prices remain high, Expansys has a 1.5 GHz e2 for about 700 pounds and a similar model with T-Mobile 3g for 840.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For Europeans looking for a pocketable computer, don&#8217;t rule out the OQO e2. While the stateside prices remain high, Expansys has a 1.5 GHz e2 for about 700 pounds and a similar model with T-Mobile 3g for 840.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kes</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9/#comment-11028</link>
		<dc:creator>Kes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9/#comment-11028</guid>
		<description>Thanks Chippy. 
Interesting... I had looked at the Q1 Ultra but not really given it serious consideration. I thought it was starting to look a little dated and not great value. For £500 I could just about get the 600 MHz version. 
I was veering towards the M912 or even the Everun Note given your glowing praise of it. The M912 seems like a better value product (albeit a tad heavy) but you&#039;re the expert.
I&#039;m a bit confused as to how a 600MHz Intel A110 compares to a 1.6GHz Atom power-wise.
I may have to look out for Q1 Ultra bargains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Chippy.<br />
Interesting&#8230; I had looked at the Q1 Ultra but not really given it serious consideration. I thought it was starting to look a little dated and not great value. For £500 I could just about get the 600 MHz version.<br />
I was veering towards the M912 or even the Everun Note given your glowing praise of it. The M912 seems like a better value product (albeit a tad heavy) but you&#8217;re the expert.<br />
I&#8217;m a bit confused as to how a 600MHz Intel A110 compares to a 1.6GHz Atom power-wise.<br />
I may have to look out for Q1 Ultra bargains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9/#comment-10990</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9/#comment-10990</guid>
		<description>Well the OpenBook design from VIA should be a 1kg/9inches device with a 2.5in HDD.

However we are still waiting for any OpenBook-based device to be actually released and publicly available... And weight could be finally higher, or maybe it will be 1kg with a damn small battery that won&#039;t last for long. :-/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the OpenBook design from VIA should be a 1kg/9inches device with a 2.5in HDD.</p>
<p>However we are still waiting for any OpenBook-based device to be actually released and publicly available&#8230; And weight could be finally higher, or maybe it will be 1kg with a damn small battery that won&#8217;t last for long. :-/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9/#comment-10989</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/ccc-week-challenges-7-9/#comment-10989</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your response!  I&#039;ve looked at the SH6 and SH8, but comparing the prices to the M912, it just didn&#039;t seem worth the price.  As for the 1.8 inch drives - while they are getting larger, the 2.5 are getting larger faster, and with the data set that I have, (and it is growing all the time), I&#039;m afraid that the 1.8 will always be below the curve for me.

But it is also nice to know that it seems like I picked the right machine!

Thanks again!

bj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your response!  I&#8217;ve looked at the SH6 and SH8, but comparing the prices to the M912, it just didn&#8217;t seem worth the price.  As for the 1.8 inch drives &#8211; while they are getting larger, the 2.5 are getting larger faster, and with the data set that I have, (and it is growing all the time), I&#8217;m afraid that the 1.8 will always be below the curve for me.</p>
<p>But it is also nice to know that it seems like I picked the right machine!</p>
<p>Thanks again!</p>
<p>bj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

