<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moorestown. Working silicon demo&#8217;d at IDF Taipei</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/moorestown-working-silicon-demod-at-idf-taipei/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/moorestown-working-silicon-demod-at-idf-taipei/</link>
	<description>portable pc, mobile computer, pocket pc and handheld computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:29:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProDigit</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/moorestown-working-silicon-demod-at-idf-taipei/#comment-11519</link>
		<dc:creator>ProDigit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/moorestown-working-silicon-demod-at-idf-taipei#comment-11519</guid>
		<description>more info about moorestown:

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/Moorestown-Intel-MID,6513.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>more info about moorestown:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/Moorestown-Intel-MID,6513.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.tomshardware.com/news/Moorestown-Intel-MID,6513.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chippy</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/moorestown-working-silicon-demod-at-idf-taipei/#comment-11433</link>
		<dc:creator>Chippy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/moorestown-working-silicon-demod-at-idf-taipei#comment-11433</guid>
		<description>Thanks DL. Was it actually a working sample?

The 6-hour battery life ones are probably the Viliv S5 and the Wibrain i1. I&#039;m liking that Viliv a lot.

Steve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks DL. Was it actually a working sample?</p>
<p>The 6-hour battery life ones are probably the Viliv S5 and the Wibrain i1. I&#8217;m liking that Viliv a lot.</p>
<p>Steve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PDE</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/moorestown-working-silicon-demod-at-idf-taipei/#comment-11431</link>
		<dc:creator>PDE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/moorestown-working-silicon-demod-at-idf-taipei#comment-11431</guid>
		<description>Where is OQO Atom?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is OQO Atom?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DL Byron</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/moorestown-working-silicon-demod-at-idf-taipei/#comment-11429</link>
		<dc:creator>DL Byron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/moorestown-working-silicon-demod-at-idf-taipei#comment-11429</guid>
		<description>Intel was most keen to show us this prototype device at the Taipei Blogger Party  . . 

http://www.flickr.com/photos/huggerindustries/2953685337/in/pool-intelidf

Will spend more time with MIDs tomorrow; they ones we&#039;re photo&#039;d from the Tech Showcase are claiming 6 hour battery life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intel was most keen to show us this prototype device at the Taipei Blogger Party  . . </p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/huggerindustries/2953685337/in/pool-intelidf" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/huggerindustries/2953685337/in/pool-intelidf</a></p>
<p>Will spend more time with MIDs tomorrow; they ones we&#8217;re photo&#8217;d from the Tech Showcase are claiming 6 hour battery life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/moorestown-working-silicon-demod-at-idf-taipei/#comment-11428</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/2008/10/moorestown-working-silicon-demod-at-idf-taipei#comment-11428</guid>
		<description>&quot;Don’t expect too much information about Moorestown this week though as Intel have already stated that the next announcements are to come at the Spring IDF in 2009. In fact, if Menlow is anything to go by, the timeframe between first demonstrations and product availability will be about 18 months. We’ll keep an eye out for videos and details about Moorestown though.&quot;

I&#039;m going to try to be an optimist about this.  Silverthorne was a very cheap way for Intel to test the waters for this market.  Kinda a 1 size fits all chip for all the varieties of low power devices.  Netbooks took off, and soaked up all the Si making MID&#039;s not so easy to develop, and I think that was one of the reasons that they took so long to bring to market.  Also, it&#039;s rather hard to really cater to the MID market with the battery life #&#039;s they&#039;re sporting right now.

Lincroft is designed specifically for the handheld device segment, with other different chips for Nettop/Netbook&#039;s and other segments.  Because it&#039;s focused towards only the MID/smartphone segment, and has huge gains in power effincy, I think the time to market may come down.

*shrug*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Don’t expect too much information about Moorestown this week though as Intel have already stated that the next announcements are to come at the Spring IDF in 2009. In fact, if Menlow is anything to go by, the timeframe between first demonstrations and product availability will be about 18 months. We’ll keep an eye out for videos and details about Moorestown though.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to try to be an optimist about this.  Silverthorne was a very cheap way for Intel to test the waters for this market.  Kinda a 1 size fits all chip for all the varieties of low power devices.  Netbooks took off, and soaked up all the Si making MID&#8217;s not so easy to develop, and I think that was one of the reasons that they took so long to bring to market.  Also, it&#8217;s rather hard to really cater to the MID market with the battery life #&#8217;s they&#8217;re sporting right now.</p>
<p>Lincroft is designed specifically for the handheld device segment, with other different chips for Nettop/Netbook&#8217;s and other segments.  Because it&#8217;s focused towards only the MID/smartphone segment, and has huge gains in power effincy, I think the time to market may come down.</p>
<p>*shrug*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

