<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looking forward to a Palm Pre Family</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.umpcportal.com/2009/01/looking-forward-to-a-palm-pre-family/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2009/01/looking-forward-to-a-palm-pre-family/</link>
	<description>portable pc, mobile computer, pocket pc and handheld computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:29:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: reverendo</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2009/01/looking-forward-to-a-palm-pre-family/#comment-17476</link>
		<dc:creator>reverendo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 13:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/?p=5384#comment-17476</guid>
		<description>Chippy
were you dreaming when you mentioned a Palm Pre-Pro or is it something that will be coming. 4&#039;&#039; with Pro-mobile stuff would be lovely on the Pro
give me some feedback, please
hope hearing from you

André</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chippy<br />
were you dreaming when you mentioned a Palm Pre-Pro or is it something that will be coming. 4&#8221; with Pro-mobile stuff would be lovely on the Pro<br />
give me some feedback, please<br />
hope hearing from you</p>
<p>André</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TareX</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2009/01/looking-forward-to-a-palm-pre-family/#comment-17468</link>
		<dc:creator>TareX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 05:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/?p=5384#comment-17468</guid>
		<description>Well I think it&#039;s understood that I meant a Tegra-equipped phone vs a Pre. I&#039;m not talking about the Pre&#039;s amazing processor, I&#039;m comparing the UI experience as a whole. Tegra looks fantastic and is suoer capable, but Pre is functional in a way I have never imagined a phone could be. Synergy, Automated Search, UI... brilliant. But then again, seeing how gaming looks on the iPhone, I cannot start to imagine how brilliant it would be on a Tegra phone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I think it&#8217;s understood that I meant a Tegra-equipped phone vs a Pre. I&#8217;m not talking about the Pre&#8217;s amazing processor, I&#8217;m comparing the UI experience as a whole. Tegra looks fantastic and is suoer capable, but Pre is functional in a way I have never imagined a phone could be. Synergy, Automated Search, UI&#8230; brilliant. But then again, seeing how gaming looks on the iPhone, I cannot start to imagine how brilliant it would be on a Tegra phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roninja</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2009/01/looking-forward-to-a-palm-pre-family/#comment-17424</link>
		<dc:creator>roninja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/?p=5384#comment-17424</guid>
		<description>Tegra v Pre - how do you compare a chipset (SoC) and a Phone? The comparison has to be Tegra xxx v OMAP 3430 in this instance. Not sure who wins here but given the success of PowerVR SGX in the embedded arena I am guessing its the later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tegra v Pre &#8211; how do you compare a chipset (SoC) and a Phone? The comparison has to be Tegra xxx v OMAP 3430 in this instance. Not sure who wins here but given the success of PowerVR SGX in the embedded arena I am guessing its the later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cane</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2009/01/looking-forward-to-a-palm-pre-family/#comment-17412</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/?p=5384#comment-17412</guid>
		<description>Nice analysis except for this bit:

&gt;&gt;&gt;the application suite won’t be as rich as it is for Linux-based

Huh?  What?

1) Not all Linux can have 3rd-party apps added (just ask Wayne MacPhail!)
http://mikecane2008.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/linux-the-best-reason-for-windows-xp/

2) Linux is for geeks
http://mikecane2008.wordpress.com/2008/10/22/wayne-macphails-linux-vindication/

3) I haven&#039;t yet seen anyone rave about how installing Linux apps approaches the click-click-click ease of even Windows installers

It&#039;ll be interesting to see if your power calculations work out as you state.  I know you&#039;re an expert at that.  At least you give a realistic estimate versus that ridiculous article Ars Technica just ran, which was on the level of John Dvorak:
http://mikecane.wordpress.com/2007/04/05/i-call-this-bullshit/

Ah, so many links.  Bound to wind up in your spam folder now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice analysis except for this bit:</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;the application suite won’t be as rich as it is for Linux-based</p>
<p>Huh?  What?</p>
<p>1) Not all Linux can have 3rd-party apps added (just ask Wayne MacPhail!)<br />
<a href="http://mikecane2008.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/linux-the-best-reason-for-windows-xp/" rel="nofollow">http://mikecane2008.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/linux-the-best-reason-for-windows-xp/</a></p>
<p>2) Linux is for geeks<br />
<a href="http://mikecane2008.wordpress.com/2008/10/22/wayne-macphails-linux-vindication/" rel="nofollow">http://mikecane2008.wordpress.com/2008/10/22/wayne-macphails-linux-vindication/</a></p>
<p>3) I haven&#8217;t yet seen anyone rave about how installing Linux apps approaches the click-click-click ease of even Windows installers</p>
<p>It&#8217;ll be interesting to see if your power calculations work out as you state.  I know you&#8217;re an expert at that.  At least you give a realistic estimate versus that ridiculous article Ars Technica just ran, which was on the level of John Dvorak:<br />
<a href="http://mikecane.wordpress.com/2007/04/05/i-call-this-bullshit/" rel="nofollow">http://mikecane.wordpress.com/2007/04/05/i-call-this-bullshit/</a></p>
<p>Ah, so many links.  Bound to wind up in your spam folder now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cane</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2009/01/looking-forward-to-a-palm-pre-family/#comment-53320</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/?p=5384#comment-53320</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Looking forward to a Palm Pre Family http://tinyurl.com/cllk8z&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color:#EEEEEE">
<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Looking forward to a Palm Pre Family <a href="http://tinyurl.com/cllk8z" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/cllk8z</a></span></span></span></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cajun_Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2009/01/looking-forward-to-a-palm-pre-family/#comment-17411</link>
		<dc:creator>Cajun_Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/?p=5384#comment-17411</guid>
		<description>Good stuff Chippy.  As a subscriber to sprint for more than a decade I am happy to finally see that we&#039;re getting a much desired phone first.   I&#039;m currently using a Blackberry 8830 and very happy with it but when I&#039;m in a pinch and need to hit the web, it&#039;s lacking.   

So, my 2009 purchases are two..  Palm Pre (already on waiting list with my sprint business contact) and a UMID M1.   ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff Chippy.  As a subscriber to sprint for more than a decade I am happy to finally see that we&#8217;re getting a much desired phone first.   I&#8217;m currently using a Blackberry 8830 and very happy with it but when I&#8217;m in a pinch and need to hit the web, it&#8217;s lacking.   </p>
<p>So, my 2009 purchases are two..  Palm Pre (already on waiting list with my sprint business contact) and a UMID M1.   <img src='http://www.umpcportal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chippy</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2009/01/looking-forward-to-a-palm-pre-family/#comment-17408</link>
		<dc:creator>Chippy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/?p=5384#comment-17408</guid>
		<description>On power consumption I guess they will have the advantage for 2009 and most of 2010. The problem is that only the highest end ARM processors are reaching acceptable broswing and rendering speeds and as web pages get more complex, Intel will keep the advantage there. The 1.3Ghz Atom is a real gem for internet browsing.

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On power consumption I guess they will have the advantage for 2009 and most of 2010. The problem is that only the highest end ARM processors are reaching acceptable broswing and rendering speeds and as web pages get more complex, Intel will keep the advantage there. The 1.3Ghz Atom is a real gem for internet browsing.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2009/01/looking-forward-to-a-palm-pre-family/#comment-17403</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/?p=5384#comment-17403</guid>
		<description>ARM CPU&#039;s could beat Intel for some time to come on power consumption.  Cheaper + longer battery life is a big plus.

Can&#039;t wait to see something with the Zii processor too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ARM CPU&#8217;s could beat Intel for some time to come on power consumption.  Cheaper + longer battery life is a big plus.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t wait to see something with the Zii processor too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chippy</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2009/01/looking-forward-to-a-palm-pre-family/#comment-17402</link>
		<dc:creator>Chippy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/?p=5384#comment-17402</guid>
		<description>Yup. 2W is based on my experience and tests. THe Core will run to about 800mw I think. Add the radios and dc/dc and screen and you&#039;re in the 2W range. Ti Estiamte they can get a MID down to average 1W and a netbook to 4W with OMAP.
2W is an active-internet scenario.
Steve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup. 2W is based on my experience and tests. THe Core will run to about 800mw I think. Add the radios and dc/dc and screen and you&#8217;re in the 2W range. Ti Estiamte they can get a MID down to average 1W and a netbook to 4W with OMAP.<br />
2W is an active-internet scenario.<br />
Steve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turn.self.off</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2009/01/looking-forward-to-a-palm-pre-family/#comment-17389</link>
		<dc:creator>turn.self.off</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/?p=5384#comment-17389</guid>
		<description>im not sure where you got that 2W on page downloads, chippy.

i ran into a estimate that the omap 3430 would draw less at load then the current atom draws at idle. but sadly i cant find that page right now :(

are you assuming a high W from the 3G or wifi radio?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im not sure where you got that 2W on page downloads, chippy.</p>
<p>i ran into a estimate that the omap 3430 would draw less at load then the current atom draws at idle. but sadly i cant find that page right now <img src='http://www.umpcportal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>are you assuming a high W from the 3G or wifi radio?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TareX</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2009/01/looking-forward-to-a-palm-pre-family/#comment-17383</link>
		<dc:creator>TareX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/?p=5384#comment-17383</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a Pre vs Tegra showdown for me, in Barcelona. Pre&#039;s strongest point seems to be Synergy (all contacts, all emails, all calenders, facebook.... brought together) and the vertical qwerty form factor.

Tegra&#039;s stongest point is the super fantastic brilliant 3D graphical UI capabilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a Pre vs Tegra showdown for me, in Barcelona. Pre&#8217;s strongest point seems to be Synergy (all contacts, all emails, all calenders, facebook&#8230;. brought together) and the vertical qwerty form factor.</p>
<p>Tegra&#8217;s stongest point is the super fantastic brilliant 3D graphical UI capabilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

