<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weekly Netbook Roundup 3/30</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.umpcportal.com/2009/03/weekly-netbook-roundup-330/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2009/03/weekly-netbook-roundup-330/</link>
	<description>portable pc, mobile computer, pocket pc and handheld computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:17:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Hisgen</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2009/03/weekly-netbook-roundup-330/#comment-20043</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Hisgen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/?p=6678#comment-20043</guid>
		<description>does anyone have any information on  the releases of the Asus T101h and the t91?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does anyone have any information on  the releases of the Asus T101h and the t91?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2009/03/weekly-netbook-roundup-330/#comment-20018</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/?p=6678#comment-20018</guid>
		<description>Ben,

Of course using an 1.66GHz CPU instead of 1.6GHz won&#039;t add any noticeable performance increase. However, this new Atom CPU requires higher clocked RAM (566 instead of 400 I believe), suggesting that there is a better memory bandwidth -- which could lead to a noticeable performance increase. Besides, the chipset is different, which can change everything from consumption figures to overall figures...

As always, tests and benchmarks are needed ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben,</p>
<p>Of course using an 1.66GHz CPU instead of 1.6GHz won&#8217;t add any noticeable performance increase. However, this new Atom CPU requires higher clocked RAM (566 instead of 400 I believe), suggesting that there is a better memory bandwidth &#8212; which could lead to a noticeable performance increase. Besides, the chipset is different, which can change everything from consumption figures to overall figures&#8230;</p>
<p>As always, tests and benchmarks are needed <img src='http://www.umpcportal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Lang</title>
		<link>http://www.umpcportal.com/2009/03/weekly-netbook-roundup-330/#comment-53442</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Lang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umpcportal.com/?p=6678#comment-53442</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;New article: Weekly Netbook Roundup 3/30 http://cli.gs/1pTYmE&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color:#EEEEEE">
<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">New article: Weekly Netbook Roundup 3/30 <a href="http://cli.gs/1pTYmE" rel="nofollow">http://cli.gs/1pTYmE</a></span></span></span></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

