I donâ€™t have Honeycomb here and I donâ€™t have the latest Atom platform here but in the video below I do have two devices that show the browsing speed differences between Tegra 2 and Atom. The Toshibarunning the â€˜oldâ€™ Android 2.1 build and the Gigabyte Touchnote running an â€˜oldâ€™ Atom N270 are both mainstream builds and itâ€™s worth taking a look at how the browsing speed compares.
My estimate, following these tests, is that Android/Tegra is just one iteration (either software or hardware) away from matching what a netbook can provide. And remember, weâ€™re into the sub 10 second category here where 10% or 20% difference is not worth talking about. 1 second isnâ€™t much, really.
Did I miss something? Perhaps we should be running 10 tabs and Flash, thatâ€™s true. The â€˜built-for-multitaskingâ€™ X86 and Windows platform should pull ahead but consider this performance on a 7â€ screen where multitasking gets hidden by the one-pane user interface.
My final thought here is that ARM platforms are not only progressing as fast as the X86 platforms but also get a huge advantage from the massive, massive investment going into mobile software. Right now, the leading browser engines are on X86 but expect that to flip over in 2011 or 2012.
In 2007 I highlighted a 9-second penalty on ARM. In 2011, weâ€™re down to 1-2 seconds. Weâ€™re down to irrelevant differences.
Iâ€™m interested in your thoughts. Please comment below.