HD4000 Ultrabook Graphics Handle Video-encoding, Portal 2, and HD Video Playback Simultaneously With Ease [video]

Posted on 13 April 2012, Last updated on 13 April 2012 by

In 2012 we’ll see the next generation of Ultrabooks featuring the Ivy Bridge platform and integrated HD4000 graphics. Existing Ultrabooks utilize HD3000 graphics which aren’t adequate for recently released blockbuster games (see the ‘Gaming’ section of our Samsung Series 5 review). HD4000 graphics are going to be very welcomed as part of the next generation of Ultrabooks for both gaming and video encoding/decoding purposes. A benchmark from Intel comparing HD2000 and HD4000 graphics gives us an idea of how HD4000 will perform, even if we don’t have a direct comparison to HD3000 yet (note that the benchmark compares desktop processors, but the changes in performance from HD3000 to HD4000 are relevant).

At IDF Beijing 2012, Intel has a demo showing the Ivy Bridge / HD4000 platform running three taxing tasks across three separate monitors simultaneously. You’ll see video encoding, gaming (Portal 2), and HD video playback all at the same time. Quite impressively, the computer handles it with relative ease. NetbookNews shot a video of the demo in action:

The demonstration is using a standard laptop, but the same platform will find it’s way into Ultrabooks that will be launched this year.

18 Comments For This Post

  1. seb24 says:

    Any date for the first IvyBridge+HD4000 Ultrabook ?

  2. Ben Lang says:

    Intel has said that Ivy Bridge is due out “estimated early Q2 2012”. Given what we’re seeing at IDF Beijing 2012, it sounds like they are still on track for that date.

  3. seb24 says:

    I’m waiting for a Samsung 900×4 with Ivy bridge + HD4000. Or an HP 14 Spectre.

  4. Chippy says:

    My estimate for first availability is still June/July.

  5. Labelstan says:

    The chart looks like 2000 to 4000.

    Wonder why they didn’t show 3000? Because it’s closer to 4000 than 2000?

  6. DavidC1 says:

    The non-K 2600 chip used in the slide is a popular SKU used by retail markets. That’s why the comparison is like that. Only the 2600K chip uses HD Graphics 3000.

  7. Ben Lang says:

    Thanks for catching this, updated to make it clear.

  8. dude says:

    That’s nice. Too bad all the video encoders out there that make use of Nvidia’s CUDA or Intel’s Quick Sync for video encoding are crappy. 1080p hardware video decoding isn’t new and I highly doubt it supports 10 bit h.264 videos that’s starting to get some attention from video encoding fans. So, I guess, the main improvement is for games.

  9. robert says:

    I am waiting for the new samsung series 9 to be released in germany it still will have sandy bridge and i will feel cheated once they announced a later sandy bridge version lol oh well ..

  10. robert says:

    there seem to be rumours that the samsung series 9 release will be delayed which isnt so nice but the good part is that it will mean its comming with ivy bridge (hopefully just a few weeks delay)

  11. seb24 says:

    Cool !! the SAmsung 900×4 it’s a really beautiful ultrabook.

  12. bearforce1 says:

    Hi,

    Would anyone know how the 4000 compares to Nvidia cards. What woudl the equivalent Nvidia GTX be?

  13. 2J2K says:

    There is no equivalent in GTX series. HD Graphics 4000 is as good as GeForce GT 525M (3D Mark Vantage P GPU ~3000).

  14. bearforce1 says:

    Thanks heaps for helping out. That is really useful to know.

  15. Aron Griffis says:

    seb24 :
    I’m waiting for a Samsung 900×4 with Ivy bridge + HD4000. Or an HP 14 Spectre.

    Those are two I’ve been looking at too. Unfortunately the Samsung was a huge letdown when I realized it doesn’t really have DisplayPort. It has something they’ve labeled “Display Port” but it’s actually a VGA port with a Samsung-proprietary connector. Ultrabooks with HDMI aren’t interesting because they won’t drive a 27″ 2560×1440 display.

  16. James says:

    Output limit isn’t a hardware issue, 2560×1440 and higher has been supported since HDMI 1.3 specification and 1.4 supports 4K resolutions.

    So it’s mainly a software/drivers imposed limit, mainly because they don’t think the HDMI would be used for higher than standard HDTV resolutions and holdovers from DVI support.

    The HDTV industry will be moving towards 4K resolution screens over the next few years though and Windows 8 won’t be imposing resolution limits.

    So hopefully we’ll be seeing systems that can support higher resolution over HDMI soon.

  17. 2J2K says:

    Yeah, on a quad-core system everything runs smooth. I want to see how it works on an ultrabook with a low power, dual-core chip.

  18. Clean up your computers registry by clicking here says:

    I’m impressed, I have to admit. Rarely do I encounter a blog that’s both educative and interesting, and without
    a doubt, you have hit the nail on the head. The issue is something that too
    few folks are speaking intelligently about. I am very happy I came across this during my search for something regarding this.

Search UMPCPortal

Find ultra mobile PCs, Ultrabooks, Netbooks and handhelds PCs quickly using the following links:

Acer Aspire Switch 10
10.1" Intel Atom Z3745
Acer C740
11.6" Intel Celeron 3205U
VIA Nanobook
7.0" VIA C7-M
Lenovo Ideapad Flex 10
10.1" Intel Celeron N2806
Acer Aspire E11 ES1
11.6" Intel Celeron N2840
Dell Chromebook 11
11.6" Intel Celeron 2955U
Dell Latitude E7440
14.0" Intel Core i5-4200U
Acer TravelMate B113
11.6" Intel Core i3
HP Elitebook 820 G2
12.5" Intel Core i5 5300U
Acer Chromebook 11 CB3-131
11.6" Intel Celeron N2807