Browsing this Thread:
1 Anonymous Users
Bottom Previous Topic Next Topic |
| |
|
|---|
| Poster | Thread |
|---|
|
Unusual battery wear readings on the Q1 | #1 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UMPC Hero
![]()
Joined: 2006/3/22
From London, Ontario
Posts: 74
![]() |
What started as an innocent-enough question over on the Origami Project forums has turned into a pretty worrying problem for some of us; Notebook Hardware Controls is reporting unusually high "wear" levels on some Q1 batteries after only two weeks or so of use. In my case, this morning NHC reports a wear level of 11%, up from 7% yesterday and 3% when I first installed NHC a week ago.
I'm not the only one seeing this pattern, either. I'm hoping that this is just a glitch with how NHC reads the battery, but have a sinking feeling that at least some of us have faulty batteries; at least one poster from the UK is reporting 0% wear on his Q1, and eo owners are also reporting 0% wear on their machines. If you have a Q1, or if you have some ideas on what could be going on, please join us over on this thread or share your experiences and insights here. -- Steve |
|||
Posted on: 2006/6/9 14:45
|
||||
|
Re: Unusual battery wear readings on the Q1 | #2 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Origami Master
![]()
Joined: 2006/2/28
From
Posts: 482
![]() |
Wow, that sucks. At least if there is an issue it doesn't seem to be with all Q1s like the eo battery problem.
I would suppose that if it kept getting worse you could get the battery replaced from Samsung, so thats a plus |
|||
Posted on: 2006/6/9 20:18
|
||||
|
Re: Unusual battery wear readings on the Q1 | #4 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Site Administrator
![]()
Joined: 2006/3/2
From Bonn, Germany
Posts: 3727
![]() |
This is an interesting question. I've seen this mentioned a few times now.
is the battery wear resulting in shorter useable life? Steve |
|||
|
_________________
Dont forget to check out the LIVE page for live chat. |
||||
Posted on: 2006/6/26 12:13
|
||||
|
Re: Unusual battery wear readings on the Q1 | #5 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UMPC Hero
![]()
Joined: 2006/3/22
From London, Ontario
Posts: 74
![]() |
It could be a reporting glitch; mine is now back to showing 7%, and if I understand the chemistry correctly wear doesn't "recover".
I've noticed no change in battery endurance when using the unit, though a 4-7% decrease would be difficult to actually detect without careful record-keeping and analysis. -- Steve |
|||
Posted on: 2006/6/26 15:58
|
||||
|
Re: Unusual battery wear readings on the Q1 | #6 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2006/3/8
From
Posts: 680
![]() |
But it's not a bug in NHC because there is at least another program reporting the same wearing level.
|
|||
Posted on: 2006/6/29 3:06
|
||||
Top Previous Topic Next Topic |

Topic options
Print Topic
Threaded
Newest First
anton_nym
Visit Website









