You can see on this video how small the keyboard is. We estimate it to be about 90mm wide which gives a keyboard itch of around 9mm.  This report is being typed on a Kohjinsha SA1 which has a key pitch of around 15mm. People with big fingers would definitely have a problem with a 15mm pitch so maybe The Register is right. They mention the PSION 5 as a better solution and sure enough, when you check the specifications for the PSION 5 you'll find that the key pitch was 30% bigger at around 12.5mm

But is the keyboard on the E90 really meant to be for touch-typing? Probably not. Its a device that is designed to be used in two hands and therefore its keyboard is going to be used with thumbs. Unfortunately, The Register tried this too.

The reality is even worse, however. I found I made more mistakes typing on the E90 than I do on an E70 or an E61, which really are optimized for minimizing thumb input errors, particularly the E61, with its widely spaced keys. I made even more mistakes on the new communicator than on its true predecessor, the Nokia 9500. And nothing about the experience suggests I'm going to adapt to the device.

It looks like some further testing is needed on the E90 because if this report is true, it negates one of the main advantages of having the E90 in the first place.

 

Technorati tags: , ,
' />

You can see on this video how small the keyboard is. We estimate it to be about 90mm wide which gives a keyboard itch of around 9mm.  This report is being typed on a Kohjinsha SA1 which has a key pitch of around 15mm. People with big fingers would definitely have a problem with a 15mm pitch so maybe The Register is right. They mention the PSION 5 as a better solution and sure enough, when you check the specifications for the PSION 5 you'll find that the key pitch was 30% bigger at around 12.5mm

But is the keyboard on the E90 really meant to be for touch-typing? Probably not. Its a device that is designed to be used in two hands and therefore its keyboard is going to be used with thumbs. Unfortunately, The Register tried this too.

The reality is even worse, however. I found I made more mistakes typing on the E90 than I do on an E70 or an E61, which really are optimized for minimizing thumb input errors, particularly the E61, with its widely spaced keys. I made even more mistakes on the new communicator than on its true predecessor, the Nokia 9500. And nothing about the experience suggests I'm going to adapt to the device.

It looks like some further testing is needed on the E90 because if this report is true, it negates one of the main advantages of having the E90 in the first place.

 

Technorati tags: , ,
' />

The Register on the Nokia E90 keyboard

Posted on 16 February 2007, Last updated on 13 May 2015 by

The E90 is most definitely a prime piece of technology. The 800-wide screen, GPS, media capability, hsdpa capability and the dual screens are very impressive features and make a great specification list. There are, however, very few people that have been able to try out the device. My Symbian have a nice review available and where extremely positive about it. The Register, on the other hand, were not impressed with the E90 and have lots to say about the keyboard.

Alas, unless you have very small fingers indeed, you’re going to be disappointed. So you’re really obliged to use your thumbs.

You can see on this video how small the keyboard is. We estimate it to be about 90mm wide which gives a keyboard itch of around 9mm.  This report is being typed on a Kohjinsha SA1 which has a key pitch of around 15mm. People with big fingers would definitely have a problem with a 15mm pitch so maybe The Register is right. They mention the PSION 5 as a better solution and sure enough, when you check the specifications for the PSION 5 you’ll find that the key pitch was 30% bigger at around 12.5mm

But is the keyboard on the E90 really meant to be for touch-typing? Probably not. Its a device that is designed to be used in two hands and therefore its keyboard is going to be used with thumbs. Unfortunately, The Register tried this too.

The reality is even worse, however. I found I made more mistakes typing on the E90 than I do on an E70 or an E61, which really are optimized for minimizing thumb input errors, particularly the E61, with its widely spaced keys. I made even more mistakes on the new communicator than on its true predecessor, the Nokia 9500. And nothing about the experience suggests I’m going to adapt to the device.

It looks like some further testing is needed on the E90 because if this report is true, it negates one of the main advantages of having the E90 in the first place.

 

Technorati tags: Nokia, e90, keyboard

Comments are closed.

Find ultra mobile PCs, Ultrabooks, Netbooks and handhelds PCs quickly using the following links:

Acer C740
11.6" Intel Celeron 3205U
Acer Aspire Switch 10
10.1" Intel Atom Z3745
HP Elitebook 820 G2
12.5" Intel Core i5 5300U
Acer Aspire E11 ES1
11.6" Intel Celeron N2840
Acer C720 Chromebook
11.6" Intel Celeron 2955U
ASUS Zenbook UX305
13.3" Intel Core M 5Y10a
Dell Latitude E7440
14" Intel Core i5-4200U
Lenovo Thinkpad X220
12.5" Intel Core i5
Acer Chromebook 11 CB3-131
11.6" Intel Celeron N2807
Lenovo Ideapad Flex 10
10.1" Intel Celeron N2806