As has been mentioned before, the RISC/X86 race is something that will be important for consumer-grade UMPCs. If the software development teams can move forward fast enough, they might reach the level of browser capability needed to satisfy people looking for Web2.0 type support. On the other hand, if someone can get the power requirements of a PC (x86-based solution) down to sub 5W drain levels in a reasonable price bracket then very little software development work will be needed. Desktop OS' will plug straight in.

VIA and AMD have their low-power range but Intel seemed to be concentrating on a slightly different balance of low power and capability. Their ULV solutions for 2007 don't appear to be the solution for even sub 10W UMPCs but 2008 could be different. There's the '1/10th power' CPU and the Tolapai System on Chip solution. There's also the sub-Pentium CPU that was mentioned by Samsung

Maybe Tolapai or the 'Sub-Pentium CPU' is what this article is referring to. Intel's Paul Otellini talks about a new chip (not a CPU.) CNN reports that "The chip will meet the demanding power, space and performance requirements of handheld devices and will be available later this year."

Paul also says:

"Virtually every computer and handset manufacturer is struggling to figure out how they're going to compete with Apple's iPhone," Otellini said. "If we get the power and performance [of the Intel chip] right, it's going to be a killer combination."

The iPhone concept of desktop OS on small device is exactly what we're talking about in the race between low-power RISC architectures and desktop x86 architectures. If Apple have already enabled Web2.0 on RISC then everyone else has to work hard in the next 12 months to catch up with Apple. Opera 9 with Flash Mini integration could be one sticky-tape solution but tighter integration is needed for long term customer satisfaction.

Its a question I'm ready to put to Intel next week. I don't expect a straight answer but if I ask the right questions and give it enough thought, maybe I can deduce the answer.

Via ilounge

Technorati tags: , ,
' />

As has been mentioned before, the RISC/X86 race is something that will be important for consumer-grade UMPCs. If the software development teams can move forward fast enough, they might reach the level of browser capability needed to satisfy people looking for Web2.0 type support. On the other hand, if someone can get the power requirements of a PC (x86-based solution) down to sub 5W drain levels in a reasonable price bracket then very little software development work will be needed. Desktop OS' will plug straight in.

VIA and AMD have their low-power range but Intel seemed to be concentrating on a slightly different balance of low power and capability. Their ULV solutions for 2007 don't appear to be the solution for even sub 10W UMPCs but 2008 could be different. There's the '1/10th power' CPU and the Tolapai System on Chip solution. There's also the sub-Pentium CPU that was mentioned by Samsung

Maybe Tolapai or the 'Sub-Pentium CPU' is what this article is referring to. Intel's Paul Otellini talks about a new chip (not a CPU.) CNN reports that "The chip will meet the demanding power, space and performance requirements of handheld devices and will be available later this year."

Paul also says:

"Virtually every computer and handset manufacturer is struggling to figure out how they're going to compete with Apple's iPhone," Otellini said. "If we get the power and performance [of the Intel chip] right, it's going to be a killer combination."

The iPhone concept of desktop OS on small device is exactly what we're talking about in the race between low-power RISC architectures and desktop x86 architectures. If Apple have already enabled Web2.0 on RISC then everyone else has to work hard in the next 12 months to catch up with Apple. Opera 9 with Flash Mini integration could be one sticky-tape solution but tighter integration is needed for long term customer satisfaction.

Its a question I'm ready to put to Intel next week. I don't expect a straight answer but if I ask the right questions and give it enough thought, maybe I can deduce the answer.

Via ilounge

Technorati tags: , ,
' />

Intel low-power chip could be sub-umpc relevant

Posted on 08 March 2007, Last updated on 22 May 2015 by

That’s a horrible title. Sorry! What I mean is, “RISC vs x86. Does Intel have an answer?” But I don’t like question marks in my titles.

As has been mentioned before, the RISC/X86 race is something that will be important for consumer-grade UMPCs. If the software development teams can move forward fast enough, they might reach the level of browser capability needed to satisfy people looking for Web2.0 type support. On the other hand, if someone can get the power requirements of a PC (x86-based solution) down to sub 5W drain levels in a reasonable price bracket then very little software development work will be needed. Desktop OS’ will plug straight in.

VIA and AMD have their low-power range but Intel seemed to be concentrating on a slightly different balance of low power and capability. Their ULV solutions for 2007 don’t appear to be the solution for even sub 10W UMPCs but 2008 could be different. There’s the ‘1/10th power’ CPU and the Tolapai System on Chip solution. There’s also the sub-Pentium CPU that was mentioned by Samsung

Maybe Tolapai or the ‘Sub-Pentium CPU’ is what this article is referring to. Intel’s Paul Otellini talks about a new chip (not a CPU.) CNN reports that “The chip will meet the demanding power, space and performance requirements of handheld devices and will be available later this year.”

Paul also says:

“Virtually every computer and handset manufacturer is struggling to figure out how they’re going to compete with Apple’s iPhone,” Otellini said. “If we get the power and performance [of the Intel chip] right, it’s going to be a killer combination.”

The iPhone concept of desktop OS on small device is exactly what we’re talking about in the race between low-power RISC architectures and desktop x86 architectures. If Apple have already enabled Web2.0 on RISC then everyone else has to work hard in the next 12 months to catch up with Apple. Opera 9 with Flash Mini integration could be one sticky-tape solution but tighter integration is needed for long term customer satisfaction.

Its a question I’m ready to put to Intel next week. I don’t expect a straight answer but if I ask the right questions and give it enough thought, maybe I can deduce the answer.

Via ilounge

Technorati tags: intel, ulv, tolapai

Comments are closed.

Search UMPCPortal

Find ultra mobile PCs, Ultrabooks, Netbooks and handhelds PCs quickly using the following links:

Acer C740
11.6" Intel Celeron 3205U
Acer Aspire Switch 10
10.1" Intel Atom Z3745
Acer Aspire E11 ES1
11.6" Intel Celeron N2840
Lenovo Thinkpad X220
12.5" Intel Core i5
Acer Aspire S3 (Haswell)
13.3" Intel Core 4th-Gen (Haswell)
HP Chromebook 11 G3
11.6" Intel Celeron N2830
Acer C720 Chromebook
11.6" Intel Celeron 2955U
Dell Latitude E7440
14.0" Intel Core i5-4200U
ASUS T100
10.0" Intel Atom Z3740
ASUS Zenbook UX305
13.3" Intel Core M 5Y10a