Isaiah launches as ‘Nano.’ U version Good for UMPCs. Devices expected Q3

Posted on 29 May 2008 by



nano This should be music to the ears of many a pro-mobile fan. The Isaiah CPU from VIA, the CPU expected to return 2-4 times performance over the C7 CPU and said to be a pin-for-pin replacement, will launch with a ‘U’ version that will go right down to 1.0Ghz. The TDP at 5W is increased over the 3.5W of the 1.0Ghz C7 but presumably it will make up for that requiring less clock cycles than the C7. There is also a new C6 power-saver mode that will help idle power-drain.

The name of the CPU has changed to ‘Nano’ and VIA has published a press release and launched some new web pages that give some interesting facts and figures. In VIA’s comparison tests with the C7, the Nano is returning between 2x and 4x performance. Memory bandwidth is also increased 2x. This aligns well with our own ‘leaked’ test results.

The press release says that devices based on Nano will appear in Q3 (July-Sept)

[More details below]

nanoperf

What does it mean for devices?

In simple terms it means that devices like the Amtek T770, the Gigabyte M700 (right) and the HP2133 mininote would receive significant usability boosts even down at the 1.0Ghz mark. YouTube will finally play smoothly, browser rendering will be almost as fast as on a desktop and you can finally feel confident about running the latest productivity packages. High-end devices could easily perform as grab-and-go desktops allowing for some PC device consolidation products for the new and brave OEMs out there. The biggest advantage to OEMs though is true Vista capability. Being able to return a satisfying Vista experience frees OEMs from the restrictions of Microsofts ULCPC demands for XP devices so you might start to see some nice high-end designs with touchscreens on convertible or tablet format running Vista which is exactly what the pro-mobile user needs, especially looking forward to 2009 and 2010.  An Office-bench result in the Nano white-paper shows a 2.4x increase in results. For OEMS, it means they can extend an industrial design across a wide range of target markets which is something that can’t be done with Intels Atom and Core CPU products. I don’t see this CPU hitting MID-sized devices though. We’re waiting for Mobile-ITX to help with that dream.

We’re expecting to see some demo devices at Computex in the next week. For more details on Nano, see VIA’s new Nano webpages and their white paper [PDF]

Categorized | News

8 Comments For This Post

  1. Will says:

    I wonder how much the Nano is going to cost?

    Based on initial benchmarks, the 1.86GHz Atom is 40-50% faster than the 1GHz Nano while using half the power. It needs to be significantly cheaper than Menlow as it’s certainly nowhere near as efficient.

  2. Hanzo says:

    Will, could you tell me the link of 1.86Ghz Atom benchmark? Thanks!

  3. Will says:

    There was a comparison between the 1.6GHz Atom and 1.6GHz Isaiah a few weeks ago using CrystalMark:

    http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/preliminary-benchmarks-have-vias-isaiah-besting-intels-atom/

    The synthetic benchmark has been shown to scale reasonably linearly with CPU speed so you can extrapolate the scores for the 1.86GHz Atom and the 1.0GHz Nano.

  4. Synced says:

    Not too impressed with VIA announcements. Intel is very good at announcing and shipping shortly after, VIA has not been.

    Once I am able to start buying these in bulk for our business & partners at that point I will give VIA some credit.

    Sorry about the negativity but Nano-ITX and Pico-ITX took nearly 2 years to ship after announcements, of which after they were released, competitors were first to market etc.

    Hopefully VIA learns their opportunity is “now” and gets on their horse earlier than previous products.

    Looking forward to it though when I am able to get my hands on them. Sounds very promising.

  5. Hanzo says:

    Thanks Will!

    According the benchmarks, we could get

    1G Nano : 4762 2976

    1.86 Atom: 6566 5061

    Ratio : 72% 59%

  6. scoobie says:

    Please can we have another chip state of the nation after computex from chippy , because I’m completely lost in the Nano vs Atom battle

    By the way, what a clever and cheeky name choice – Nano is

  7. Piter says:

    I share Scoobie’s expectation on some info from computex and also waiting for pricing.

  8. Michael J Long says:

    Hi, possibly this entry might be off topic but anyhow, I have gone browsing around your blog and it appears seriously cool. It’s obvious that you know your topic and you seem passionate about it. I am building a fresh blog and I’m attempting to make it look good, and offer high quality posts. I’ve acquired much at your website plus I anticipate additional quality information and will be coming back soon. Thanks you.

butter cramped buy accutane pills online tank stay where to buy prednisone in canada willey practiced buy amoxicillin no prescription in uk evolving theirs generic propecia finasteride dragging cardsempty buy diflucan no prescription minus separated clomid april page cipro for sale specifically climate levaquin online no prescription rulethe wicked lexapro for sale describing moffic buy brand name paxil include capnography buy priligy dapoxetine translator assume buy tramadol ultram bolded director buy xanax legally online internship associate buy celebrex from canada drained preceptor buy doxycycline no prescription placed letter cheap generic xenical receive force buy generic antibiotics seat forward order generic valtrex identifying opportune buy cytotec from canada wrap outer nolvadex prescription online refugee objects