Apple MacBook Pro 13” Retina Squeezes in More Pixels, Watts and CPU than Any Ultrabook

Posted on 23 October 2012 by


Apple now has another product that compares well with the Ultrabook sector, and it’s very impressive. Weighing in at 1.63KG / 3.57lbs the Macbook Pro 13” offers more processing headroom, a lot of pixel density, two Thunderbolt ports, backlit keyboard, SSD and a huge, really huge, 74Wh battery. That alone is an engineering feat that others need to be aware of.

The MacBook Pro 13” entry level model comes with a Core i5 (probably the i5-3210M) running at 2.5Ghz with Turbo up to 3.1Ghz. This is a 35W TDP part so while browsing drain is likely to be on-par with an Ultrabook, it will push some scary battery drain rates under heavy load. The 74Wh battery should help to offset that though and knowing that these platforms can run about 10W Wi-Fi connected browsing, 7hrs should be no problem as long as you’re not doing anything that’s going to toggle those pixels too much. The retina display (2560×1600) will certainly require some GPU power to keep it updated.

$1699 is the entry level price though so if you want 768GB SSD and a Core i7, go ahead, if you’ve got $3199 ready to hand-over!

Two Thunderbolt ports, stereo speakers, HDMI, SDXC and two USB3.0 ports keep you connected.

Graphics on all 13.3” models is HD4000 but there’s a new 15” (2880×1800) model that includes an Nvidia GT 650M. The 15” MacBook Pro Retina includes a 95Wh battery and weighs 4.46 pounds, 2.20KG which is still impressive.

For comparison’s sake, the Samsung Series 9 13.3” with a Core i7 (1.9Ghz-3Ghz), 256GB SSD but only 4GB RAM and a 1600×900 screen has a 60Wh battery, one of the biggest on the Ultrabook market. The price for that (RRP) is about the same as the new MacBook Pro 13” Retina. The weight of that though is only 2.6lb

$1699 is certainly not cheap but that’s not the point. Apple have just shown that there’s more that can be done with a 13.3” Ultrabook design.

More information here at Apple.  We’ll get the Apple MacBook Pro Retina models in the database for you soon.

  • Ghost

    I don’t think you can call this an ultrabook, it doesnt have a low voltage cpu and its not certified by intel.

    Or my interpretation of ‘ultrabook’ is wrong.

    Other then that, its a alot of power put in a small 13 inch frame.
    I personally do not know why you should have more then 1920×1080 for a 13 inch screen. even 1600×900 on the samsung 9 series looks amazing.

    • Chippy

      I didn’t call it an Ultrabook!

  • Flo

    What’s the difference in processors between the rMBP 13 inches and the i7 in the UX32VD for example ?
    I still prefer the UX32VD :) But of course the battery isn’t that enormous!

  • Flo

    Well, they seem to be the same.
    So upgraded UX32VD definitely better for me ^^

    • Chippy

      They are different parts. rMBP uses a 35W TDP CPU. ASUS uses a 17W TDP part at lower voltage. It’s a more efficient CPU but it has less power capability on the top end. FOr low-end use you wont notice much (maybe 5%-10%) but at high-end usage, the difference in battery usage is large.

      I wrote some details about the differences here.

      • DavidC1

        In the datasheets, there’s about a watt difference in mostly idle scenarios, and in LFM, which is the lowest frequency, 16W. So yes, the differences can be noticeable. That’s not even mentioning platform level differences.

        Probably 15% difference in browsing, and 40-50% in really heavy load. All with iGPUs.

  • I am genuinely glad to glance at this weblog posts which contains lots of
    valuable information, thanks for providing these kinds of

Recommended Reading