Will Apple really release something drastically different from the iPhone?

Updated on 05 November 2009 by

Original image from http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/11/05/apple-tablet-concept-the-ipad-touch/

Time draws closer to the event in which Apple is rumored to unveil a new, larger, touch oriented device. Let’s call it the iPod Plus (as Chippy coined it) essentially a device based around the concepts of the iPhone/iPod Touch (simple touch navigated software) but with less focus on the phone aspect and more focus on media and web interaction. No one knows for sure yet but people are imagining a small slate style device with a highly touch friendly OS with a screen ranging from 5-8 inch. Being a happy iPhone owner, I’m very excited about the prospect of a new device that could culminate the lessons that Apple learned from the iPhone and use the great part of that experience to power a new media rich device. As I think about what it could mean for the company to release a new device, which would probably have a very different size than the iPhone and also run software that isn’t directly compatible with the iPhone hardware, I wonder if it will really happen the way that it is rumored, considering the hurdles that stand in the way.

Software and Developers

Apple has set off some sort of revolution with their App Store, an application that makes it very simple for users to find useful software for their iPhone/iPod Touch. Since the release of Apple’s App Store, we’ve seen the App Catalog for the upcoming Palm Pre, the Android Market for Android powered devices, the Windows Marketplace for devices running WM 6.5, and the BlackBerry App World for certain BlackBerrys. The concept of an App Store is great for many reasons. The biggest of which are the ease in which users can find and obtain applications and the ease in which developers can distribute their applications. By providing a virtual store for all third party software, Apple makes it easy for developers to focus on creating applications instead of having to make round-about back-ends for activation codes if they wanted to sell their applications. The App Store is an huge draw for developers.

That is apparent as Apple recently announced that the one billionth application was downloaded from the App Store. Just throwing out some rough numbers, let’s say that 50% of the applications downloaded from the App Store were free and that the other 50% cost just $2.99. If 500,000,000 applications have been downloaded at $2.99 each (Apple takes 30% of the price of the app), then you are talking about $448,500,000 of profit directly into Apple’s pocket by doing no more than providing a framework on which developers can reach an audience. Clearly the App Store and the concept of applications is very important to the success of the iPhone/iPod Touch, and I would say that Apple would need to think long and hard before coming out with a new device that would be unlikely to support some 35,000 applications which currently run across the entire iPhone/iPod Touch (gen 1 and 2) line of devices.

If they were considering this, I don’t think that Apple would release a device that is essentially a giant iPhone. More likely it seems that they would release a media rich device using an improved version of the iPhone OS (which is actually based on the full fledged OSX). Given the larger dimension of the device, and the likelihood that it won’t be phone, I think that Apple will have designed a new navigation philosophy and will probably want that experience to translate over to applications. Thus I don’t feel that they could simply port over all of the applications currently available in the App Store. Not only would the existing applications not work without scaling on a higher resoultion screen, but these apps would need to be rebuilt entirely for this new device to be compatible with the improved version of the iPhone OS and to function using the same navigation principals as Apple established with the device, as many apps in the current App Store have a consistent interface design that works to make system-wide finger navigation viable.

By releasing a new device based on different principals of user interaction and making current App Store applications incompatible, Apple would be throwing its current library of 35,000 third-party applications out the window and additionally they would be trying to split their strong base of developers.

As a developer who wants to sell an application, it would be hard for Apple to convince you to start developing for a new device that doesn’t have backward compatibility with the old devices. Any developer would realize that the current audience, which includes anyone with a 1st or 2nd gen iPhone or iPod Touch, would be much larger than a newly released device. And why might someone spend the time developing an application for the newer hardware when the audience would be so much smaller. Sure, eventually the numbers would start to even out, but it would be hard to get the ball rolling and see the same widespread development of applications on the iPod Plus as we’ve seen with current App Store apps.

Apple’s steady strategy for said devices has been based on compatibility. Even while coming out with new generations of the two devices, Apple has made it clear that they want every application in the App Store to be able to run on every generation and model of their ‘touch’ series of devices. Why break the trend now? There is definitely a time to move forward and come up with something new but Apple has seen great success with their current strategy and it might be too early for them to jump to new hardware and thus, new applications that would require that new hardware to function.

Nintendo is a company that works using a similar strategy of backward-compatibility. The company is responsible for one of the most successful handheld game consoles and part of that has to do with the fact that the handheld gaming system can play the same games from the previous handheld game generation released all the way back in 2001. Similarly, Nintendo’s Wii console can play games from the previous generation that was also released in 2001. While the Nintendo Wii definitely isn’t the most powerful of the three current gaming consoles, it is doing better than the other two in sales, partly due to its backward compatibility.

Size and Portability

I’ve recently come to realize how great the iPhone is as a gym companion. Heading to the gym to do some exercise with the iPhone in a holster on the waist has plenty to offer one who is doing various gym activities. Music is the most obvious thing that comes to mind. It couldn’t be easier to put together a playlist and with the included earbuds, you can change tracks easily using the button on the cord without even having to look at the iPhone, one can even answer and hang up calls with the same button and the ringtone comes right over the earbuds. Beyond just listening to music, the iPhone can be great for web consumption when on the stationary bike. Some people like to read a book using the little shelf on the bike, but the iPhone sits there just as well and provides a portal into one’s online life. Its great to be able to exercise while checking twitter, Facebook, Google Reader, etc.

While hunched over and tapping my fingers around on the iPhone’s small screen, I realized how great that the little magazine/book shelf would work with an iPod Plus. Imagine a 7 inch screen sitting flat right there where a book might go and offering a great touch navigated media experience. You could read full web pages and easily flick your way up and down the page to see the contents without having to frequently pinch zoom. Considering more powerful hardware, you could have a nice twitter app running in the background that would notify you of new updates using a Growl style notification system. Sounds great to me, but when I considered that the iPhone simply comes with me to the gym in a holster on my waist, I wondered how I would carry such a device with me.

With a 7 inch screen I don’t think it would be very pocketable. It wouldn’t be the companion style device that could play music for you while lifting. What does one do with a device that sits between the size of a pocketable phone and a notebook? The iPhone is usable while walking because it can be held in one hand an operated, but a device such as that which has been rumored sounds like it would need to sit down on a table and have the attention of both user’s hands in order to be operated. Sound familiar? That’s right, notebook basically needs to be put down on a table and have interaction from both hands to be effectively used, and I don’t think that Apple wants to compete with their own notebook line. Apple hit the sweet spot when coming up with a device that could be used with one hand and slip into the pocket with no problem.

Summing it up

There are certainly a lot of factors that go into the creation of a new device and I’m sure that Apple looks into this stuff with much scrutiny before trying to push a big new product. While I would love to see an iPod Plus device with a large screen that featured a great new interface and the ability to consume media rich content, I think that it is unlikely to see anything radically different from an iPhone. It doesn’t seem likely that Apple would release a device that is more powerful, isn’t compatible with the apps in the current App Store and also sits at a size that competes with the MacBook line of notebooks. What’s more is that Apple doesn’t want to split their developer community, and would have a hard time starting up the wildfire of rapid application development that was part of success of the current ‘touch’ series of devices.

More from us. (No silly ads.)

30 Comments For This Post

  1. Ben Lang says:

    New article: Will Apple really release something drastically different from the iPhone? http://cli.gs/en97dG

  2. Hail_Acme says:

    no matter how drastically different it is one thing is for sure it wont have fm radio but the usability doent really matter as long as it’s shiny and overpriced because of their ad campains and so on http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BnLbv6QYcA&feature=fvst love this one :)

  3. Vit says:

    LOL! Tipical Apple fanboy. As long as it shines and Apple!

  4. Hail_Acme says:

    actually i am an applehater because they totally suck and for no reason at all a lot of stupid people just love them did you check out the link reaaaaaaly funny parody

  5. Marc says:

    I’m an Apple hater too, however I imported a first gen iPhone to the UK long before they were available here. I’m a gadget addict and wanted a quick play before making a profit on eBay.

    And I fell in love. There isn’t a single hand held gadget that has survived with me as long as the iPhone has, and I’ve tried a lot of PDAs, MIDs and UMPCs.

    It just works, and does it so nicely that if they can do the same in a small tablet I’ll pay their silly prices.

  6. Hail_Acme says:

    i am sorry for you mark dont fall in love with pieces of shit ALL HAIL ACME

  7. Crape says:

    actually a 6-7″ device can be quite pocketable if it has almost no bezel at all & is very thin.

    people seem to think 7″ isnt pocketable because of the UMPC craze a few years ago, but it just isnt true.

  8. Iphone Funaddict says:

    Will Apple really release something drastically different from the … http://bit.ly/nh5Er

  9. Antonio Lopez Fdz. says:

    Will Apple really release something drastically different from the iPhone? http://ff.im/-2Mwzr

  10. BB Developer says:

    Will Apple really release something drastically different from the … http://tinyurl.com/q5uut8

  11. johnkzin says:

    Haven’t all of the rumors pretty solidly put it at a 10″ touch screen?

    Though, the concept that jkontherun posted a week or two ago is the one that sounds most interesting to me. A folding/flexing netbook that’s 13″ fully open, 8.5″ when folded, and can be used like a netbook, a tablet, or an all-in-one computer. That’s what I’d really love to see right now (from Apple, or from Nokia even).

  12. TheNero says:

    keep in mind, a 7″ screen is only about 6″ x 3.75″ which is just barely bigger than an OQO & still very pocketable. if they went a little smaller like 6″ or 6.5″ it could be even smaller than an OQO.

    this is only if its a bezel-less device & very thin, which is quite possible since Apple isnt a fan of thumbboards or real buttons anymore.

  13. JC says:

    Actually, an OQO is 5.5″x3.3″, so no, it wouldn’t be smaller than an OQO. (I suspect one of the reasons why an OQO is so expensive is shaving off that last half inch from 6″ to 5.5″.) However, a Viliv is about the size you mentioned and that does fit in a pant pocket, if barely. (Obviously, it easily fits in to a jacket pocket.)

    Apple has yet to make a bezel-less device. No one has made a device with a 7″ screen that fits in a pocket. That doesn’t mean it won’t happen, but the only people I see who care about 7″ screens are people who read this blog on the like. If Apple doesn’t want to tap into the netbook market, it’s hard to see them tapping into an even smaller one.

  14. Crape says:

    by 6″ & 6.5″ i meant the SCREEN, which could technically be smaller than the OQO if it was a bezel-less design.

  15. Ryan Phillips says:

    Using Twitter?? Will Apple really release something drastically different from the …: Some peop.. http://tinyurl.com/q5uut8

  16. iPhone x 3 says:

    Using Twitter?? Will Apple really release something drastically different from the …: http://tinyurl.com/q5uut8

  17. Marc says:

    I’d almost kill for a 5″ version of the iPhone with a 1024×600 screen and full internet experience.

    They can lose voice, so long as they leave a HSDPA sim card slot in there….

  18. Sokonomi says:

    You can forget about that resolution. ;) The “supposedly awesome” 3D graphics chip in the iphone would crap bricks if it had to go factor 2 on resolution.

  19. Vakeros says:

    With a 5ml bezel they can have a very pocketable 5.6″ device. Make it even less of a bezel and you can have a bigger device. You could have 6.5″ and still be pocketable.
    If Apple were to go to market, then the easiest way would be to double the pixels in each direction so 960 x 640. This is easy for scalability and all existing apps. could then run on it. Or if you go for a 1024×640 screen, the extra pixels can be switched off whilst in compatibility mode, and back on for web browsing and other new applications.
    If the Viliv S5 has 1024×600 and is pocketable – I’m sure Apple could make a similiar device, but with their OS/UI and simplicity of use.

  20. Vakeros says:

    Sorry that should be 5mm bezel. I obviously need a drink.

  21. scrootch says:

    Love my iPhone more and more every day, because of usability and daily new apps, now for a bigger screened device, it needs to offer a Mac OS functional touch solution, to be really attractive.

    I dont see Apple doing something half made, I think this would be a device where a POCKETABLE MAC EXPERIENCE FIRST SEES THE LIGHT, the iPhone have the touch usability and next step will be Mac OS 10.? pocketable with word, excel (iWork) installed. Here´s hoping for that!

  22. Sokonomi says:

    iWork on something without an offscreen keyboard seems kinda pointless to me imho. Even on 7″ an onscreen keyboard would probably eat tomuch screen estate to do any meaningfull stuff with iWork. Plus they will have to pony up some serious resolution. iPhones resolution is appaulingly low.

  23. johnkzin says:

    I agree that some apps wouldn’t work well without a physical keyboard… which is why one of the things I hope for on this Apple middle-size device is: some form of USB-Host or USB-OTG support. Either an accessible port right on the device, or a dock that has one (2-3) of them.

    Then you can use non-keyboard apps, or apps that are ok with a little bit of virtual thumb keyboarding, on the go … or sit down at a desk/table, pull out the keyboard (and, maybe dock), and start doing some real work. No need to carry both this tablet AND a laptop.

  24. john says:

    Do you envision such a device as being able to surf the internet…*all* of the internet? In other words, would it be compatible with, and able to view the content of, the ‘few’ sites that use Flash and Java? Might it be able to stream internet radio and videos without relying upon specific apps for specific sites? THAT would be a great device.

    Unlike the current, internet-crippled iPhone/Touch.

  25. Ben says:

    Ya I would imagine that the device should be able to handle most web content, but again the Flash thing might not work so well even if it was supported through the device because the touch navigation is much different than using a mouse and the Flash content would have a hard time making sense of it.

  26. David Gawlowski says:

    Will Apple really release something drastically different from the iPhone? http://ow.ly/6nBi

  27. Suppy says:

    I think device like that will never be built by Apple. Not for next 4-6 yeras. It is a big shame…

  28. Benjamin Cox says:

    Some guy named Ben (no relation) has an interesting take on Apple’s potentially forthcoming bigger iphone thingy: http://twurl.nl/44clbj

  29. Ben says:

    http://bit.ly/17JUdG Interesting take on a conceptual Apple MID.

  30. Ben Lang says:

    We still haven't seen the Apple tablet? I wrote this back in May: http://is.gd/4NJGM

Recommended Reading

Top Ultra Mobile PCs

Dell Latitude E7440
14.0" Intel Core i5-4200U
GPD Pocket 2
7.0" Intel Core m3-8100Y
Lenovo Ideapad Flex 10
10.1" Intel Celeron N2806
Viliv S5
4.8" Intel Atom (Silverthorne)
GPD Win 2
6.0" Intel m3 7Y30
Acer Aspire E11 ES1
11.6" Intel Celeron N2840
Acer Aspire Switch 10
10.1" Intel Atom Z3745
LG G8X THINQ Dual Screen
6.4" Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Medion Akoya Mini
10.2" Intel Atom (Diamondville)
Toshiba Portege Z930
13.3" Intel Core i5 3427U