Why We Don’t Write About Every Tablet

Updated on 05 October 2010 by

We have a limited amount of time to write articles for Carrypad so we try and pick products that truly fit what we believe to be a consumer internet device. Here are three very important points we consider:

  • Web – High quality browser (but not full internet experience with Flash, plugins.) because 50% of tweets, many emails, many facebook updates come with a link that needs a browser. It’s the common denominator of applications.
  • User interface – Must be finger-focused (if no pointer controls or keyboard are included in the design.) Developing a rich, deep, comfortable and enjoyable UI is a skilled job and takes a long time.
  • Applications (built-in or downloadable minimum requirements we expect to see) – Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, text editing, email (POP3, IMAP), PDF viewer, Epub viewer, image viewer/editor, mp3 player, video player, weather app, PIM (contacts, calendar with synchronization.)


[More detail in this article]

There aren’t many products that fit the bill but more importantly, there are a ton of products that pretend to fit the bill. Most of these come from China and tend to be built to price rather than requirements. Have you ever wondered what the digital picture frame manufacturers do now? Yup, they make cheap tablets.

We’re not saying that these cheap products aren’t sometimes reasonable value or fitting a need but in general when a product is cheap, the quality is often poor and the product is often incomplete.

Here’s an example of a poorly finished product that many will buy because it looks and is marketed to be an iPad-a-like by a well known brand. It’s the Next (a respected middle-of-the-road clothing retail in the UK) 10 Tablet and it’s getting slated in early reviews.

The Guardian newspaper reports:

My recommendation: do not buy this item unless you have tried it out thoroughly in a shop, and found out whether you can crash it (as I did in 30 seconds).

PDA247 reports:

the Next Tablet feels hollow and tapping the screen is akin to pushing your finger onto a wobbly piece of plastic, a very thin piece of plastic at that.

It gets worse. Check those links out for more details.

Next clearly have no idea what it means to have incomplete products reviewed by important websites. Those early reviews will hang around on the web forever and whatever Next does to improve the software will have no significance because no-one will bother to re-review it and write about it.

We’ve lived-with and had hands-on with literally hundreds of tablets in the last four years. We’ve used them for productivity, entertainment and sofa-surfing. In short, we have a reasonable idea about a what a successful recipe would be. Admittedly there’s a certain amount of magic and third-party developer weight that can turn a tablet from so-so into something interesting but you need the basic groundwork to be solid first.

The tablet market is becoming a mess and customers are going to be ripped-off left right and center so we suggest you check with us before making that purchase. All the tablets we’ve checked out are in the product database.

1 Comments For This Post

  1. alslayer says:

    Wow only 30 minutes of battery life. That is a really bad tablet.

Recommended Reading

Top Ultra Mobile PCs

Dell Latitude E7440
14.0" Intel Core i5-4200U
GPD Pocket 2
7.0" Intel Core m3-8100Y
Viliv S5
4.8" Intel Atom (Silverthorne)
GPD Win 2
6.0" Intel m3 7Y30
Lenovo Ideapad Flex 10
10.1" Intel Celeron N2806
Acer Aspire E11 ES1
11.6" Intel Celeron N2840
HP Elitebook 820 G2
12.5" Intel Core i5 5300U
Microsoft Surface Go
10.0" Intel Pentium 4415Y
Acer Aspire Switch 10
10.1" Intel Atom Z3745
LG G8X THINQ Dual Screen
6.4" Qualcomm Snapdragon 855