Acer Aspire V5-122P – System Idle Power and Temash Tablet Thoughts

Updated on 06 March 2014 by

2013-05-13-2493This post is both a keyboard test and a power test for the AMD A6-1450 Temash-based Acer V5 122P. I’m currently typing on the Acer Aspire V5 in Windows Live Writer and will be writing for about 10 minutes with the system in a low-power state. The energy saving power profile is keeping the CPU clock down to 1Ghz max and with a 50% screen brightness, WiFi off, keyboard backlight off and Perfmon running in the background I should be able to see just how long a typist could get out of this sub-notebook. It’s a test I did on the Samsung Series 5 recently and it’s a great one to see just how much ‘background’ power is used in a system. On the Samsung Series 5 Ultrabook test I saw an average system power usage of 6.4 Watts. Are AMD Temash products going to be better than that and good enough for some Ultra-Mobile products? Let’s find out.

As I glance over to the power meter while I type I’m seeing an average power drain of 5.7W. In a previous, idle, test I saw 5.2W idle drain with Wi-Fi on and the screen set to 50% as I have it here.

Here are a few other test figures.

  • System idle (screen minimum): 4.14W
  • Screen off: 4.0W (lowest idle drain)
  • Screen 100%: 5.1W
  • Keyboard backlight adds about 1W to system drain which is more than I had expected.

battery typing

The fan has just started to run but the system is completely cool to the touch. System power usage has just gone up to 6.3W.

This sort of background drain when idle with screen-on is just not good enough for highly mobile, long battery life tablets unfortunately.

Clovertrail mainboards have reduced background power to near-zero, Haswell mainboards will do that in the near future. BayTrail too. Without this fine-grained power control, AMD won’t be able to compete in the long battery-life tablet space with Temash although it does provide a nice level of computing power for the power used.

AMD Temash has been highlighted as a Windows 8 tablet platform. Unfortunately, like the Y-series Core processors at similar power  and performance rates, these traditional style PC processors don’t have the fine-grain power control to compete. Temash is better positioned as a next-gen Netbook platform than a tablet platform in my opinion.

So, after 12 minutes typing the average power utilization shown is 6.3W which is no better than a good Ultrabook in terms of system efficiency. With WiFi turned on you should expect a minimum of 0.5W additional power usage and due to background tasks that go active once the Internet is connected, regular peaks in CPU and disk usage. Up to 5hrs typing from the built-in battery is possible but the average user is likely to see that figure drop to 4hrs or less if Internet is connected.

The Temash platform is available in a 2-Core version (AMD A4) that can be put into a fanless design. That’s nice, but the processing power available there would be like Clovertrail – not quite enough for a good Windows 8 experience.

What we need is AMD A6-1450 processing power with a Clovertrail power envelope – something Intel’s BayTrail promises later this year.

More from us. (No silly ads.)

5 Comments For This Post

  1. gmb says:

    Only 1.1W from display off to max brightness. Isn’t this a bit on the low side?

  2. curaga says:

    I’m confused about the screen power only taking up 1 W. Are you talking about the keyboard backlight or the screen backlight. You talk about both. Maybe I’m reading the bullet list wrong.

  3. Chippy says:

    It seems that the keyboard backlight takes more than I expected (1W) and that the screen takes a lot less than I expected (1.1W max) I was surprised too and ran the tests a number of times. Remember though that the screen is only 11.6″ and the full brightness isn’t fantastic. I’d estimate 200 nits.

  4. James says:

    Have you tried it outdoors?

    I know Samsung makes a power efficient 11.6″ HD display that consumed only 1.1W… Luminance varies from outdoors at 400cd/m2 and indoors at 200d/m2.

    Anyway, they’ve been promising more power efficient display for years (the Samsung display was first demoed back in 2009) and looks like they’re finally starting to use them…

  5. Mitchell C. says:

    We must make note that this is only Acer’s rendition of the processor. They put a temash processor where a kabini processor ought to be. Temash, while efficient, quickly loses its efficiency with Turbo Dock and Fans.

    Other temash solutions can in fact be fanless and not overclocked in the base and perhaps be more power efficient than this one.

    With the newer power gating and sleep states 1.0ghz ought to be just fine in 2-4 core solutions at this IPC for light/HW-Accelerated multitasking and power efficiency.

    Also, connected standby, while nice, is barely a selling point. The system is known to use some power if it updates, even in sleep. Windows 8 has near-instant wifi connection so on or off it doesn’t matter. Wifi cards themselves do not use much power unless under full load (File Transfers and network boots).

Search UMPCPortal

Top Ultra Mobile PCs

Recommended Reading

GPD Pocket 2
7.0" Intel Core m3-8100Y
Viliv S5
4.8" Intel Atom (Silverthorne)
GPD Win 2
6.0" Intel m3 7Y30
Acer Aspire E11 ES1
11.6" Intel Celeron N2840
Archos 9
9.0" Intel Atom Z510
Microsoft Surface Go
10.0" Intel Pentium 4415Y
HP Chromebook 11 G3
11.6" Intel Celeron N2830
Lenovo ThinkPad P40
14.0" Intel Core i7 5500U
Lenovo IdeaPad A10
10.1" ARM Cortex A9 (Dual-Core)
Samsung Galaxy Book 12
12.0" Intel Core i5 7200U