It’s going to be a confusing year for Ultrabook graphics as Haswell feeds-in. Not only are we still seeing sales of Sandy Bridge 2nd-gen Core-based Ultrabooks [can we take these out of the Ultrabook arena please, Intel?] but the new 4th-Gen Ultrabooks will be coming with a wider range of GPU options than ever before. HD 4200, HD 4400, HD 5000 and HD 5100 (Intel Iris) GPUs are listed. Today we get the first indicators of performance on the HD4xxx range with HD5xxxx performance indicators likely in the next 24hrs thanks to a new Apple MacBook Air that was launched yesterday.
- Current list of Haswell Ultrabook (4th-Gen Core) processors.
- Current list of Haswell Ultrabooks
- Learn about Intel Haswell Ultrabook features
It’s the HD4000-range that has surprised us. Back in September Intel led us to believe that all Ultrabooks would come with ‘dual-slice’ graphics (HD5xxx-series) but it’s not the case as the new Acer S7 Ultrabook proves. The Sony Vaio Duo 13 and Toshiba Z10T are two other devices (arguably not Ultrabooks though) that are getting an HD4xxx option. The Lifebook UH90 is another.
The Acer S7 with Intel Core i7-4500U has been tested by Anandtech. The Sony Vaio Pro 11 (with the same processor) has been tested by Laptopmag.
| Test | Acer S7 (HD4400) | Vaio Pro 11 (HD4400) | Our Ivy Bridge Average |
| Cinebench OpenGL | na | 14 | 14.2 |
| 3DMark 11 | na | 647 | na |
| 3DMark06 | 5691 | na | 4323 |
The HD4400 uses a similar architecture to Ivy Bridges HD4000 and a max clock of 1Ghz (*1.1Ghz in the Core i7 processors) so it’s no surprise that performance results are in the Ivy-Bridge class. Anand comments: “Intel’s HD 4400 takes half a step forward, but it doesn’t dramatically change the playability of games that HD 4000 couldn’t run well.” Add the fact that the CPU performance isn’t greatly improved over Ivy Bridge and what have you got? We all expect performance improvements in updated processor platforms but in this case, Ultrabook-category processors that include HD4xxx graphics are focused purely on longer battery life, smaller mainboard footprint and lower TDP for ‘tighter’ designs. Those battery life improvements are huge though so don’t ignore it.
As for HD5000 graphics we’ve got readers here that have ordered the Sony Vaio Duo 13 with the HD5000 option. [Keep us posted, Matt!] and we’ll have a fresh data-point soon when people start testing the HD5000 GPU on the new Apple MacBook Air 11 and 13 with Core i5-4250U (that are offering up to 9hrs web-working on a 35Wh battery and 12 hours on a 50Wh battery.)
HD5100 Intel Iris graphics (in a 28W TDP package) will be available on processors such as the Core i3-4158UCore-i5 4288U, Core i5-4258U and Core i7-4558U later in the year.
June 11th, 2013 at 3:30 pm
Hi Steve,
There are already some IRIS performance tests on IRIS, I will try to find a link and post it here.
Also, SemiAccurate.com has run benchmarks on the HD-4600
June 11th, 2013 at 4:12 pm
Hi Touko. Semiaccurate did HD 4600 with a quad-core desktop part though, i think, right? I think it’s important (here) to be reporting HD graphics performance on the U and Y-series processors.
June 14th, 2013 at 3:25 am
Of course, you’re right. All that desktop HD-4600 benchmarks can do is give us a high water line, since the U and Y series are not likely to match desktop performance.
So in that way, the test was enough to dowse my interest in any HD-4×00 part.
June 11th, 2013 at 4:31 pm
Hey Chippy. I’ve done a couple of tests myself as well.
http://www.ultrabookreview.com/2946-sony-vaio-pro-13-review/
Vaio Pro with Intel Hd 4600. I also have a video showing how it deals with games
June 11th, 2013 at 5:07 pm
Hey Mike.
I must keep a closer watch on your site. Good stuff. I’ve added it to the product page.
Do you still have the Pro 13?
Chippy
June 12th, 2013 at 1:26 am
I see where you got the “HD 4600” from. The GPU monitoring utilities are not good finding out infos on Intel GPUs, because Intel doesn’t release information directly to the developers. HD 4600 is on the regular voltage chips and desktops.
But Core i5 4200U is using HD 4400. That’s stated right on the Intel site.
June 14th, 2013 at 3:41 am
Thanks for the review, Mike!
You’re the second person who talks about the flex of the machine making it feel precarious…
Flex certainly is not good for circuit boards, as the thousands of tiny leads on them easily develop intermittent contact. So we can only hope that the chassis flex does not translate into any kind of circuit board flex.
I still haven’t forgotten about all the macbook users with bad solder joints on their nvidia cards, which then the company refused to acknowledge for a long time, before eventually helping people with unusable machines years later.
Shareholder value should never replace honor for corporate management.
The machine does look tempting but it seems Sony put form over function with the edge of the wrist rest.
June 11th, 2013 at 5:17 pm
I don’t, only had it from Thursday till yesterday. But I hope to get the Duo 13 and the Pro 11 as well this week.
June 12th, 2013 at 1:19 am
It uses a HD 4400, not 4600.
June 13th, 2013 at 12:34 am
hwinfo, gpuz and a bunch of others were all showing that it came with Intel HD 4600. I found that odd, since intel lists this cpu with 4400 and also the config on Sony’s website offers the same 4400…
June 13th, 2013 at 2:06 am
Sounds like a software bug to me. It happens often with new chips with hwinfo, gpuz, cpuz, etc.
June 13th, 2013 at 2:24 am
Could be it’s basically the same GMA, just different default settings…
Like setting clock speeds, etc. to differentiate products it could all still be from the same FAB batch.
Both the 4400 and 4600 have 20 execution unit cores… So the difference may only be how it’s optimized, with the 4400 likely having lower clock values to conserve power, etc.
June 12th, 2013 at 1:21 am
Sony Vaio’s are known to get hot. I wonder what kind of thermal throttling people will get on them.
June 16th, 2013 at 5:51 am
It’ll be interesting how long these Haswell ultrabooks can maintain turbo boost and at what frequency. I know for desktop Core CPUs, motherboard manufacturers actually allow you to force the max turbo normally allowed for a single core even when all cores are under load. That’s because turbo control is actually done outside the CPU. I assume notebook makers are allowed this kind of flexibility as well.
I bet the Sony Vaios will do the worst since they’re always getting thermally throttled let alone maintaining the turbo frequency.
June 19th, 2013 at 1:35 pm
We will need to see before coming down to conclusions.
Depending on the optimization the heat may be depreciated.
June 29th, 2013 at 12:01 am
Notebookcheck also got a few benchmarks of the 5000:
http://www.notebookcheck.com/Intel-HD-Graphics-5000.91975.0.html
So far they only have benchmarks for MacBook Air but they’ll add more. Comparable to PC GPU perf?
July 1st, 2013 at 8:24 am
MYtechpartner has benchmark numbers for HD 4000 GPU as well – http://mytechpartner.com/intel-hd-4400-benchmark/
July 9th, 2013 at 6:38 pm
Just like shares or perhaps provides, possibilities tend to be thought to
be any safety measures and so are as a result some sort of executed long term contract involving the 2 parties.
Another purpose that is certainly distinctive to binary options assets can be his or her choice of binary
options assets investments: These feature’s incorporate “Auto-trade”, allowing shareholders for making identical buy and sell around several successive periods as well as the “Close” and “Extend” binary options assets giving investors the selection to be able to near a small business early to relieve the loss or improve the expiration time so as to raise help.