Surface Pro 3. Engineering vs Demand vs Future

Updated on 21 May 2014 by

Surface Pro 3 Image  (18)

It’s exactly 12-hours after the launch of the Microsoft Surface Pro 3 as I start to write this article. I’ve spent a number of hours hours researching and making notes on this unique product and have come to one main conclusion. Microsoft has a superbly engineered product in the Surface Pro 3 but it’s too early for mainstream 2-in-1 customers.

First-off, I agree with 12-inches tablets. There’s an interesting market and 2-in-1 opportunity developing as technology improves. The 11.6-inch Samsung XE700T, seen back in 2011, was a breakthrough product combining a Core i5 CPU with a weight of just 890 grams. It had a digitizer layer, a dock, keyboard and was one of the first well-designed premium Tablet PCs that wasn’t just built for the medical industry, logistics or some other specialist market. It wasn’t hugely successful but a follow-up product, the XE500T, was a complete 2-in-1 with a tablet that weighed just 750 grams. I bought one and enjoyed it as a ‘laptop-first’ 2-in-1. Then there was the Sony Vaio Tap 11 which offered Core CPUs in just 780 grams and very recently I was excited about the Samsung Galaxy Note Pro, an Android device with 2560×1440 screen in 750 grams.

Surface Pro 3 Image  (2)

The common factor in all these devices were that they were offering that 11.6-inch screen which is really the smallest screen size I, and many others, would recommend as a single 2-in-1 solution that covers productivity. The problem, however, is that even at 750 grams the weight is too much. With that experience in mind I’m looking at the 800 gram Surface Pro 3 and thinking, no, it’s too heavy.

It’s too early to bring a Core-based tablet to the market at 12-inches because much better things are round the corner and the company that waits 12-18 months longer is going to break through with a potential 2-in-1 winner that will blow the Surface Pro 3 out of the water.

Let’s think about that fan for a minute. Microsoft appear to have based the whole design of the tablet, including the all-round air vents and the mainboard around a new, improved fan design. Why? We’ve already seen fanless Core-based products which, while not removing the need for specialist thermal engineering, do remove the only moving part and save space and thickness. One of the key features of Broadwell, the next generation of Core CPU that could launch in just a few weeks, is that certain SKUs will be targeted at fan-less designs. The Surface Pro 3 is immediately obvious to me as a product that takes current ultrabook-style design techniques to their absolute limit but it still results in a heavy tablet that has a fan. It’s a complete no-no for a tablet that want’s to attract those upgrading a laptop while also looking at a tablet; potentially tens of millions.

Surface Pro 3 Image  (14)

Microsoft Surface Pro 3 detailed specifications and other information.

The good thing about the Surface Pro 3 is that it is a unique product and there is a target market for it. It’s an active and growing market but it’s not a market of tens of millions of sales. The Surface Pro speaks to exactly the people that have been reading Ultrabooknews and UMPCPortal. They are pro-mobile, productive, creative and highly focused customers that have a specific need. The Digitizer, a component that many will be looking for detailed tests on, appeals to designers, designers artists, natural handwriting fans, education and possibly CAD users, especially when paired with 8GB of RAM. The $1299 entry cost for that configuration won’t bother them too much because there’s nothing much out there that competes.  The Fujitsu Lifebook T904, a product that speaks to similar customers, starts at around $2000 for a Core i5 / 8GB spec. The Lenovo Thinkpad Yoga, also in the same customer category, is much closer at around $1200-1400

There are some other ‘highlight’ features to think about.

  • A high-quality, high-contrast screen with high DPI and quality color coverage is important to many in the creative industry.
  • Multi-position kickstand that fold al the way back for a digitizer experience is unique in the market.
  • 2160×1140 resolution (3:2 aspect ratio) should please tablet PC fans.
  • DisplayPort offers 4K output and chained monitor possibility.
  • AC Wifi is the best WiFi standard available right now and not seen in many products.
  • Price breakthrough. The Core i3, 64GB version could be something we’ll see at $699 in offers soon. You just know that Microsoft have left room for that and Core i3 Haswell with touch, digitizer, fast SSD and 4GB RAM is going to be appealing. For people like me who don’t need the full CPU power of the Core i7 but do need a fast SSD, fast video encoding and long battery life, it’s quite attractive, especially as it will dock into my DisplayLink docks and be just as powerful as the Ivy Bridge CPU Ultrabook I use today.

Surface Pro 3 Image  (15)

A quick word on that battery life before we move on to listing the spec’s and prices now. It’s a small battery. I know, from experience, that a 12-inch LED-backlit LCD panel, takes a lot of energy. I know, from experience, that the average power usage for this processing platform is going to be 5-6W while browsing. I know that if you’re gaming, power usage will go beyond 25W and that, if you’re not careful with your program usage and setup you’ll be using 10W for web-working. It will, of course, stay in active-standby for hundreds of hours too and play videos for 10hours at a low-ish screen brightness but don’t expect to get through a long day of work without charging and if you’re working hard, you could be looking at under 4 hours battery life.

Oh, and there’s no place to put the digitizer which is always a minus-point.

You can order the Microsoft Surface Pro 3 from today in the USA and the Core i5 version will be in shops on June 20th. I assume online orders will ship then too. By the end of August, the Surface Pro 3 and some accessories will become available for purchase in 26 additional markets, including Australia, Austria, Belgium, China, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Malaysia, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand and the United Kingdom.

Potential issues for the Surface Pro 3

  • You’ll see tablets based on the next generation Intel Core architecture later this year but you might not be able to get them freely until early in 2015.
  • This is not a fanless tablet
  • There’s no full-size SD card slot
  • An 8GB model will start with 256GB SSD at $1299
  • The N-Trig digitizer, I assume using the Duo-sense technology, needs to be tested.
  • Accessories are extra
  • No pen stowage
  • No GPS, NFC
  • No 3G/LTE option at launch


It’s great to see Microsoft pushing the pro TabletPC category and putting such marketing weight behind it. The Surface Pro 3 is lighter than the Surface Pro 2 and will offer a better 2-in-1 environment in most cases. The engineering appears to be top-notch and at $799 for a Core i3 and 64GB is makes a very interesting tabletPC choice. If you’re looking at graphical usage you’ll probably have to step up to 8GB of RAM which takes you immediately to $1299 which isn’t so attractive. Independent creatives may have to hold-back at that price.

The only problem I have with the Surface Pro 3 is that it might have been better to wait another year. It’s not the thinness that worries me, it’s the weight and I already know that even 11.6-inch tablets at 700-800 grams are too heavy for casual mainstream PC use. For that, we may have to look at newer products running Baytrail later this year. Come on Samsung, let’s have an update of the ATIV 500T!

Pro-mobile users should also consider the Lenovo Thinkpad Yoga and the Fujitsu Lifebook T904 but if a Tablet PC is the focal point for a creative project the Surface Pro 3 has to be at the top of the list.

You’ll find all the lightweight 2-in-1’s listed here.

For a list of lightweight Windows 8 tablets, see this list.


Surface Pro 3 Prices:

Surface Pro 3    Estimated retail price (USD)
Intel® Core™ i3, 64 GB and 4 GB of RAM    $799
Intel® Core™ i5, 128 GB7 and 4 GB of RAM    $999
Intel® Core™ i5, 256 GB7 and 8 GB of RAM    $1,299
Intel® Core™ i7, 256 GB7 and 8 GB of RAM    $1,549
Intel® Core™ i7, 512 GB7 and 8 GB of RAM    $1,949

Surface Pro 3 Image  (17)

Surface Pro 3 Accessories     Estimated retail price (USD)
Surface Pro Type Cover    $129.99
Additional Surface Pen    $49.99
Additional 36W Power Supply    $79.99
Additional Pen Loop    $4.99
Docking Station for Surface Pro 3    $199.99
Surface Ethernet Adapter    $39.99

More from us. (No silly ads.)

10 Comments For This Post

  1. Daniel says:

    For your information:

    – There is a pen stowage on the type cover.
    – The Surface pen is included in the price (if you want an additional, then you have to pay 50$)
    – Microsoft is saying 9 hours of battery life for web browsing. Before you actually test the device, I don’t see the point in complaining about it.

    Also, you only seems to be comparing it with an iPad. What about the MacBook Air? I think Microsoft made it pretty clear that this is not a tablet. It is a compromise for people who need both things.

  2. Steve Chippy Paine says:

    I stated that the web power usage would be 5-6W = 7-8.4hrs battery life. I didn’t complain about it.

  3. Luc says:

    First battery tests so far range from 7:30 – 9 hours. At least it’s better relatively speaking than previous model despite larger screen.

    I don’t understand the no-no comment about heavy tablet. What would you have rather seen?
    Is an under 500 grams 12″ tablet really possible especially with full size SD, GPS, …?

    Even an iPad you wouldn’t hold for hours so kickstand I find personally just fine and 800 grams is still relatively light.

    In the end remember that everyone has different needs for me this is perfect balance but if not I wouldn’t say it’s a no-no tablet device.

  4. Mark Johnston says:

    Also Broadwell will not launch in a few weeks, it has been pushed back to the holiday season (end of year), so the internals won’t be obsoleted in a hurry.

    Personally this is exactly what I was hoping for coming from a dying Thinkpad X61T, I feel that 12″ size is the optimal compromize between efficient productivity and portability.

  5. David Simpson says:

    Whether this is expensive or not depends entirely on the use it’s put to. I’ve been waiting for a more powerful Surface 3 to use alongside an AIO, but a Pro 3, i7 with 8gb of RAM, used with a dock and decent monitor would be far more useful, and cheaper all round. For those who use one as a laptop replacement and can deal with the size as a tablet, it’s a money saver.

    Waiting for Broadwell might be worth it if not wanting to replace anything now, but how long with it take to get to the market in this form factor?

  6. Bob Duffy says:

    Good post. I generally agree, but I don’t agree it would have been better to wait. The first Surface helped usher in the 2:1 category to mainstream. It pushed OEMs to innovate and compete. Same will happen here. Crappy digitizer and a me too tablet are not enough. I’d love to see Sony and Samsung answer with something in this space . People are settling in on phones for mobile convenience and now want Tablets, to do more, and be a replacement for the Laptop (sub 50% mobile). I suspect Chromebooks will eat into Android and iPad sales, and Pro Tablets and 2:1s eating into traditional laptops. While Broadwell is around the corner, Microsoft is showing they are not unaccustomed to iterating, so there is still room for a Surface 4 with Broadwell in 2015. And these chips now come in various flavors, released over many months, not all at once. The line between generations gets blurred. And so the next flavor they seek in the next generation may allow for enough room between now and then to create an appetite for performance tablet with Surface 3 to get back to school sales. I for one am seriously considering it. I’m still on Gen 3 Core. The initial Haswell designs just didn’t move me enough. But with 256GB drive 8GB RAM + i7 in this form factor…. now that is something:-).

  7. mark says:

    It’s true that the weight of Intel Core tablets is a bit on the high side, and the Bay Trail devices are much better for this (I have the 550g Asus T100). But on the flip side, this is an Intel Core ultra-portable PC that’s lighter than the lightest laptop (a ~900g Sony Vaio Pro I believe).

    Things will get better, but in 12-18 months MS can bring out the Surface Pro 4.

    I think the Surface is somewhat like Google’s Nexus (which sold poorly before the Nexus 4, despite Android being incredibly successful) – since it’s not the only thing that runs Windows, it doesn’t have to the best seller. MS can leave other manufacturers to release lighter/smaller 2-in-1s (as they have been doing well). But this is their opportunity to create their own devices to help guide other manufacturers.

  8. Terry Tigner says:

    Over the past 6 months I’ve come to be a regular reader of this site, Ultrabooks News, and have great appreciation for the quality and point of view of the reviews. Good job, guys!

    That said, I’m quite surprised by the negative tone of this review of the Surface Pro 3. Interestingly, the main reason I’ve kept coming back time and again to this site was in support of my constant search for a 2 in 1 type device that seems to be largely missing from the market. What I’ve been clamoring for is a device with the following features:
    – Large screen with a 3:2 aspect ratio – approaching an 8.5×11 paper
    – Great, hi resolution digitizer and pen with built in palm rejection
    – Strong processing combined with a capable keyboard to act like a real laptop
    – Real quality construction
    – A “real” file base OS (mac or win)
    – As thin and light as possible given the other requirements

    It has been unbelievable to me that hardware makers don’t seem to “get” how the combination of these features creates a synergy of great use that elevate the value and usefulness of the device into another level.

    So when MS introduced the SP3 on Tuesday, I was blown away. I think they really nailed it – at least more closely than I see elsewhere. The fact that they zoned in on the combination of these features – especially the screen size and aspect ratio – while making the device thinner and lighter than the SP2 (which I’ll be selling on ebay).

    Finally, who in the world wants to wait another year for a device that’s marginally better?? Not me. Way to go Microsoft – you’re back! And I’m in with my order in store on Tuesday for the i5 256.

    Just my 2 cents.

  9. Alchemist says:

    Agree completely. I was also surprised by the negativity.

  10. Luc says:

    Seems what was missed was the 1 year stand by. Certainly deserves to be mentioned here.

    I don’t see problem with microSD since you have USB port for adapter (XPS 12 has same issue).
    According to Microsoft you wouldn’t hear fan so why is this bad? Also is there a lighter 12″ tablet than 800 grams?

    Going with new CPU would have delayed production by months and would require longer period of testing.

1 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. The Surface Mini didn’t launch yesterday. Next stop, Computex June 4, 12:00pm says:

    […] an ultra-mobile Ultrabook…without a keyboard, but impressive nonetheless. I’ve written an editorial for Ultrabooknews that you might want to check out. Readers here, however, may have been more interested in a […]

Search UMPCPortal

Top Ultra Mobile PCs

Recommended Reading

GPD Pocket 2
7.0" Intel Core m3-8100Y
Viliv S5
4.8" Intel Atom (Silverthorne)
GPD Win 2
6.0" Intel m3 7Y30
Acer Aspire E11 ES1
11.6" Intel Celeron N2840
Archos 9
9.0" Intel Atom Z510
Microsoft Surface Go
10.0" Intel Pentium 4415Y
HP Chromebook 11 G3
11.6" Intel Celeron N2830
Lenovo ThinkPad P40
14.0" Intel Core i7 5500U
Lenovo IdeaPad A10
10.1" ARM Cortex A9 (Dual-Core)
Samsung Galaxy Book 12
12.0" Intel Core i5 7200U